GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.eeEnglish
      13·
      2 months ago

      A vehicle shutting down in the middle of the freeway can easily cause multiple accidents.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      The go pedal and the steering wheel are equivalent to a keyboard/mouse and are not physically connected to anything. If the car shuts off, the wheels go where they feel like with absolutely no driver control.

      • Auli@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        Never thought of they how would you brake if the car shutoff.

            • CmdrShepard42@lemm.eeEnglish
              0·
              2 months ago

              Definitely not as well but you can still use them. Cars didn’t even have vacuum assisted brakes up into the 1960s and 1970s

              • Malfeasant@lemm.eeEnglish
                1·
                1 month ago

                Yes, and they were designed with that in mind- brake pedals with more leverage for one…

                My mom had a Ford ranger for a while that had lost its brake boost, it took a lot of force to get it to slow down, and that wasn’t even a heavy vehicle, this was back when a pickup was a two-seater…

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          51·
          2 months ago

          Did you really just draw an equivalency between Tesla’s software practices and the aerospace industry? Even Daddy Musk isn’t stupid enough to pretend those are the same.

          Also your assertion that there is “no such thing as off” blatantly displays your horrible lack of understanding that distributed computing still relies on electricity.

          Edit: since Tesla is apparently the same thing as Airbus, can you point me to the source code published by the relevant regulatory body that controls the Cybertruck’s steering mechanism?

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              3·
              2 months ago

              Yes, I fully understand the difference between analogy and equivalency. You claimed that fly by wire on an aircraft is exactly as safe and redundant as the steering wheel of a Tesla vehicle. That’s called an equivalency and is a demonstrably false statement. I never claimed that there were no redundancies to the power supplies, but it’s simply not relevant. You do understand that there are different regulations and rigors applied to an aircraft compared to a crappy car that hasn’t even passed any crash safety testing and hasn’t been certified by any engineering standards bodies, right?

                • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  3·
                  2 months ago

                  The only good news here is that the regulators in your country aren’t stupid enough to let you operate this machine near your fellow humans.

        • Kalysta@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          2 months ago

          Have you looked at the cybertruck’s manufacturing practices? Airplanes have redundancies for their redunancies and that’s why people use them. The cybertruck was built with the “go fast and break things” model, does not have redundancies, and actually removed some standard safety features found in every other car. Like tempered glass.

          Comparing a cyber truck to an airplane is like comparing a pinewood derby car to a military personnel carrier. One was made by a child. The other is engineered to keep as many soldiers alive as possible.