Good then that they haven’t put explosives in it yet.

Short review directly from this source for those, who don’t want to read the whole article:

The Core Problem, Simply Stated

Technology is making distribution dramatically more efficient.

But efficiency gains are being captured by whoever controls the bottleneck — the platform, the marketplace, the search engine — rather than distributed to the workers who enable production or the consumers who fund it.

Without wages, workers can’t consume. Without consumption, capital has nowhere productive to go. So it piles up in buybacks and data centers. GDP growth slows. And we wonder why a world of genuine technological marvels feels economically stagnant for most people.

That’s the paradox.

As AI accelerates the substitution of capital for labor, the dynamics described here are likely to intensify rather than resolve. The question isn’t whether the technology works — it clearly does. The question is whether the institutions and incentive structures around it will evolve fast enough to distribute what it creates.

That’s the harder problem. And it’s not a technology problem at all.

Windows 7.

Doesn’t matter how advanced your weapons are if you have not enough money to use enough of them and not enough soldiers that would like to come and kill other people that can also fight them back. So, while the USA has high defending potential, it has not enough politically approved resources for a long occupational war. Only short quick operations are now possible, since the USA citizens are against the war and greatly affect the leadership authority of current government, so that it cannot waste money to launch a full scale war as it was before. Especially, because of this doesn’t pleases oligarchs which have great leverage in this situation.

I believe only in success of AI systems based on real neurons(living tissue), not just “the models”. The problem with all current AI system is that they are just modelling how real AI would look and behave like. I appreciate his attempts to turn AI slop into something more meaningful, but I do not comprehend how he is going to achieve this without creating some completely new and revolutionary approach to resemble neurons in computers.

We are not modelling real neurons even. What we have are just big functions with lots of parameters that calculate the output number based on input. That’s all.

No matter how rich you are, if you have seen the ad, then their job is done. They pay YouTube to show ads to as much people as possible, not to just ones who can afford buying their products.

People with android phones who use YouTube app.

Yeah, funny people. I personally prefer my ads to be free on free streaming services. Even if it means to wait a few weeks or so before desired content will be available on these services.

Direct access to microslop.

Probably. But they also aware that most of people use only apple or windows. Sadly, but in personal computers segment Linux is not very popular.

Cybersecurity becomes a joke for more and more organizations.

I have some suggestions about how their security engineer’s routine looks like:

LOL. As long as anyone can access your chatbot and pays for its usage they can do whatever they want with it. Even create another AI models that will be concurrents to your. Just admit that you don’t want to loose your precious money.

Dear terrorists, I don’t like your actions, but if you still exist and want to cause destruction and deaths, please, do it by attacking main offices of big corporations. That will be a tragedy for whole world. Thank you!

Sadly, but another good platform has rotten.

• You are getting auto banned by AI and your appeals are also reviewed probably by AI.

They ARE using AI for this. Crap AI that bans innocent and ignores the one who should be banned.

To be sure that they lick their boots.