The ext-image-capture-source-v1 and ext-image-copy-capture-v1 screen copy protocols build upon wlroots’ wlr-screencopy-unstable-v1 with various improvements for better screen capture support under Wayland. These new protocols should allow for better performance and window capturing support for use-cases around RDP/VNC remote desktop, screen sharing, and more.

Merge Request: Create ext-image-capture-source-v1 and ext-image-copy-capture-v1

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    under the definition of bike shedding in the Encyclopedia you’ll find wayland the prime example. been waiting years on one pr for them to decide on the word “may” vs “will”

    • gbin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It drives me crazy. Just release it 18+months ago and iterate with versions, at least your users will have the feature in their hands.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s how you get the Zoom problem, where a Zoom developer decided to be nice and port their program to Wayland before screen capture was implemented well, resulting in a “workaround” that took screenshots in a loop rather than move to the proper API.

        The API has been in the hands of people and developers for months, just not those who like their system to be moderately stable.

        • gbin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It is kind of shooting at the ambulance, zoom needs to also adapt to the new API. The alternative is a completely non functional Wayland for videoconferencing for years… Unusable stable is not better than unstable usable IMHO at least you have a shot at fixing it for the second option.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, of course. But jumping on early with an incomplete API isn’t just something Zoom does. Plenty of applications are broken because they don’t receive complete API rewrites every few years.

            Plus, it’s not like desktop Linux didn’t already ship a screen casting API. If developers wanted an unfinished/unstable API, they could’ve just implemented Gnome’s DBUS based API, that’s been around for years. No need to use something wlroots specific. Plus, the Gnome API also works on X11.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      decide on the word “may” vs “will”

      I assume they went with way land as a compromise.