- cross-posted to:
- localfuckery@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- localfuckery@sh.itjust.works
cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/45730883
With more than 80,000 AI-powered cameras across the U.S., Flock Safety has become one of cops’ go-to surveillance tools and a $7.5 billion business. Now CEO Garrett Langley has both police tech giant Axon and Chinese drone maker DJI in his sights on the way to his noble (if Sisyphean) goal: Preventing all crime in the U.S.
In a windowless room inside Atlanta’s Dunwoody police department, Lieutenant Tim Fecht hits a button and an insectile DJI drone rises silently from the station rooftop. It already has its coordinates: a local mall where a 911 call has alerted the cops to a male shoplifter. From high above the complex, Fecht zooms in on a man checking his phone, then examines a group of people waiting for a train. They’re all hundreds of yards away, but crystal clear on the room-dominating display inside the department’s crime center, a classroom-sized space with walls covered in monitors flashing real- time crime data—surveillance and license plate reader camera feeds, gunshot detection reports, digital maps showing the location of cop cars across the city. As more 911 calls come in, AI transcribes them on another screen. Fecht can access any of it with a few clicks.
Twenty minutes down the road from Dunwoody, in an office where Flock Safety’s cameras and gunshot detectors are arrayed like museum pieces, 38-year-old CEO and cofounder Garrett Langley presides over the $300 million (estimated 2024 sales) company responsible for it all. Since its founding in 2017, Flock, which was valued at $7.5 billion in its most recent funding round, has quietly built a network of more than 80,000 cameras pointed at highways, thoroughfares and parking lots across the U.S. They record not just the license plate numbers of the cars that pass them, but their make and distinctive features—broken windows, dings, bumper stickers. Langley estimates its cameras help solve 1 million crimes a year. Soon they’ll help solve even more. In August, Flock’s cameras will take to the skies mounted on its own “made in America” drones. Produced at a factory the company opened earlier this year near its Atlanta offices, they’ll add a new dimension to Flock’s business and aim to challenge Chinese drone giant DJI’s dominance.
Langley offers a prediction: In less than 10 years, Flock’s cameras, airborne and fixed, will eradicate almost all crime in the U.S. (He acknowledges that programs to boost youth employment and cut recidivism will help.) It sounds like a pipe dream from another AI-can-solve- everything tech bro, but Langley, in the face of a wave of opposition from privacy advocates and Flock’s archrival, the $2.1 billion (2024 revenue) police tech giant Axon Enterprise, is a true believer. He’s convinced that America can and should be a place where everyone feels safe. And once it’s draped in a vast net of U.S.-made Flock surveillance tech, it will be.
I wonder how they intend to tackle white collar crime.
No such thing, clearly
Flock routinely buys leaked personal data off the darkweb. They also have a highly insecure network and a ton of false positives. They need to banned and their CEO jailed with all his assets confiscated and/or frozen.
They don’t “think” that. That’s just the excuse to a totalitarian regime within a police state.
We need to start badgering our local politicians to remove this shit. This is one area where local action could feasibly make a big difference. If a few towns start becoming “flock dark zones” then the network, and value prop of the company, as a whole loses efficacy.
Also, I suspect there would be bipartisan support for this among the people.
By eliminating all free people, yes you can technically do that.
If CCTV camera feed didn’t stop all crime, AI won’t be able to stop it either. Crime is inevitable and people will do it, regardless of whether they’re on camera or not, or whether they’re being monitored.
Ah yes… Pre-crime… Just like all those utopian sci-fi novels.
Starting with the rich?
No people, no crimes. Should I be concerned?
Are you people?
I’m not legally allowed to say yes.
I can think of a few ways to do that too
glances at white house
might wana start with that… 👀
34x convicted but not sentenced criminal in there.
Thinks it can
eliminate all crime in Americamake a shit load of moneyAnd if/when it eliminates all crime it will just lobby to make more things illegal.
Either that or it will secretly fund gang activity or drug smuggling or something so that it can “catch the bad guys” and secure more lucrative government contracts
This is just an ad for obvious bullshit. Forbes may as well be running articles about how ozempic is done because of this one weird trick a local veteran discovered.
There’s just not much coverage (probably intentionally) but I wanted to post about it bc the only other recent story I could find was this one and didn’t know if it would be deleted for not being a typical news source
They’re going to build a society in which all basic needs such as access to food, water, education, housing, and health care are provided to all people making the need for most crime unnecessary???
That would actually be cheaper than what they’re trying to do.
there’s a lot of mid-century French theorists spinning in their graves right now
Can you elaborate please ? This sounds interesting
many mid-20th century French thinkers like Foucault, Debord, Deleuze and Baudrillard spent a lot of time writing about surveillance and technology. Lots of this stuff has turned out to be extremely prescient. (Ellul is another example, but as a Christian Anarchist his critiques of what he called the Technical Society, are a bit of an outlier from the other guys above who, despite a plurality of ideas and perspectives, were all coming from a pretty similar place wrt their philosophical backgrounds)
A pretty easy to digest example is Deleuze’s “Postscript on Societies of Control”, which is like 5 pages long and available for free online, written ca 1990 that is pretty spooky in how accurately it predicted the current state of affairs.
The real king here is Baudrillard but his writing isn’t always the most accessible
I’m reading Ellul right now and loving it. His predictions were pretty freaky accurate. Especially since he wasn’t really a traditional philosopher. I think he had a background in sociology, but he was a law professor, and his writing almost seems to be him writing out well educated vibes.
He also joined the French resistance against Nazis during world war ii and was firmly opposed to the idea of separating Christianity from the socialist aspects of Jesus. Just all around bad ass. I couldn’t imagine a better foil for the jackass Nazis trying to run shit now.
I kinda feel like most people should be reading the the Technological Society right now bc of how accurate his predictions were.
The focus on efficiency as a means to an end that just keeps on digging new holes to fill old ones.
Becoming so focused on achieving efficiency and then losing a piece of our humanity in the process.
He has a belief about prison camps being inevitable in a society where efficiency is the ultimate goal. But most importantly he makes it a point to emphasize that this isn’t inevitable if enough people are warned in advance and revolt against it.
his book on propaganda, The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, is also well worth a read.
I think his ideas on concentration camps/prison camps slot in nicely with Deleuze’s ideas about Control Societies and the ways that technology is being used to extend the Foucaultian ideas of discrete enclosures to never-ending enclosures in all aspects of life.
And, if you like Ellul, you should definitely check out Ivan Illich’s work. He’s another social critic coming from a heterodox Christian perspective (Catholic in this case). His ideas can seem a bit unintuitive at and even off-putting to modern sensibilities at times (especially his idea of Life as Idol and his critique of modern medicine in general) but he’s another guy with a lot going on that has been pretty accurate in his prognosticating of contemporary society.
Thank you very much :) I’ll take look!
Oh, have you read the revelation of John the Theologian? It’s becoming a reality.