• krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are you suggesting that most people would rather scan 400+ pages of a physical book than deal with ebook DRM? Because that sounds like the worst, most tedious option to me. I’m confident most would never consider scanning a viable option.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s specialized hardware out there since the 80s(?) That does this sort of thing for you. All it takes is one person and now the book is “out”. I worked with one for historical texts. Worked really well. It was so cool to see it in action.

      A lot of younger people are into physical media. Its cool to see.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, not to mention the actual advantages that come with the format, such as search, highlighting, multiple bookmarks, notes, etc. Yes, you can do most of these with a physical copy, but not without marking up your original copy or having extra materials on hand. Just way more convenient overall.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s even assuming the book you want is available and wasn’t a super limited printing that you couldn’t even begin to afford in the first place.