Eyes Up's purpose is to "preserve evidence until it can be used in court." But it has been swept up in Apple's crackdown on ICE-spotting apps.

Eyes Up’s purpose is to “preserve evidence until it can be used in court.” But it has been swept up in Apple’s attack on ICE-spotting apps.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.worldEnglish
    72·
    5 months ago

    FYI, Google is also going after ICE-spotting apps.

    And therefore, ill punish neither.

    Can you add anything else to nullify action, and foster an attitude of placid obedience?

    Please, share more ideas to help entrench the status quo.

      • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        You’re made of spare parts, aren’t ya, bud? No, therefore you should punish both, and get a phone with GrapheneOS or Linux.

        So why didn’t you just say something like Look into Graphene OS or Linux in the first place?

          • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.worldEnglish
            3·
            5 months ago

            Why did you assume I was “nullifying action”?

            Mostly your action nullifying attitude.

            I shit on Tesla on a routine basis, and get zero pushback. No bitching about other vehicle producers who also are Trumpdy Dumptys…, zero.

            I say don’t buy naziPhones, and people come out of the woodwork with every conceivable devil’s advocate angle, and basically maximize tangentiality.

            Anything other than reinforcing the message of not buying apple:

            Be mad at everyone, such that you apply pressure to no one.

            You know, nullifying action.

              • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.worldEnglish
                2·
                5 months ago

                not only that, but then your pet attack dog comes along and somehow twists that into me defending pedophiles

                I should actually pop back in and look at the thread, instead of just replying to my inbox. I have a pet attack dog? That’s kinda neat. I wasn’t aware, but neat nonetheless.

                My point stands: when called upon to boycott Tesla, no resistance. When called upon to boycott Apple, blow up the conversation into anything but generating momentum for an Apple boycott.

                It really is that reductionistic.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.socialBannedEnglish
        22·
        5 months ago

        No, they’re pointing out the chilling effect of shitting on the topic.

        You’re the kind of fuckwit that would say Chris Hansen does no good against predators because he’s one guy doing a small set of stings… You’re the kind of guy who’d shit on a compromise policy that’s otherwise still a step in the right direction. You’re the kind of guy to make good the enemy of great.

        and you have the gall to use insults when YOU are the one committing the social faux pas…

        Pathetic. If you’re going to point out flaws, be constructive with it. Otherwise it is still on YOU if someone assumes negative intent from unconstructive criticism.