• bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Because if downvotes are used to express disagreement then all it does is sort by “things agreed on by the first people in this community that saw it.” In fact many sites (like Reddit) explicitly say that’s not what it’s there for.

    Is that how most forums and communities should operate to you? Do you believe that’s how we should sort things? If so then I simply disagree with that notion and there’s not much more to say. If you don’t, then there’s your answer.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m going to jump in and say that the real question isn’t “is the disagree button bad” the real question is, “is the disagree button worse than not having it”?

      I don’t use downvote to disagree. I know some people do. But on Lemmy I’ve seen so many times awful comments with positive up notes bc no one is downvoting and hiding them

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s not really the question either. The question is “why do we have a downvote button/what do we hope it accomplishes?”

        If your goal is to have an agree/disagree binary to sort all content, then power to you because that is how it is used. But a lot of people, not just myself, don’t want that.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I disagree with “that is how it will be used” because that is not the only way people use it. Self-moderation is more of a pro than agree/disagree is a con.

          • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Self moderation clearly isn’t working if you ask me. Otherwise we wouldn’t have mods in the first place.

            I also didn’t say it was the exclusive usage but it’s certainly the dominant one.

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m not sure how you draw that conclusion. It’s not either or, you have downvoting and mods working together

              • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Let’s kind of refocus here because there are 3 things at play.

                1: What do you think we need downvotes for, 2: do you think that’s how they’re being used, and 3: are there better tools to accomplish #1?

                After that it’s an assessment of other potential cons.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t have a strong opinion on whether or not downvotes should be used to signal disagreement but I don’t think there’s much point in debating that because that’s how they are used. It seems like the only options are coming to terms with that or not using sites that have the option to downvote. I really don’t think it’s that big of a deal though. If someone doesn’t know how to disagree with others without it ruining their day then they need to learn that skill anyway.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s totally worth debating it because we could simply not have downvotes or at least hide vote scores. That changes people’s behavior demonstrably.