• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh right, in the magical world where people are giving their money away. The majority of content creators would of left your platform. But it’s okay it’s easy to steal their right to distribution and handwave it away as not a problem.

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This isn’t some magical world, this is how most open source software projects and even online content creators make their money.

      Creators make way fucking more from patron than AdSense, even if its only a percentage of their audience. Do you know how much fucking watch time it would take to match the $5 a month I give to several of my favorite producers of online video?

      A lot more than either your or I have time for, certainly more than the content they create.

      You need only a sliver of your audience to pay, and platforms like patron prove this works.

      The fact you’re baffled by even a small percentage of people donating to gratis projects says a lot about how you value volunteer labor, and its pretty fucking sad.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The large majority of open source tools that are used in mass have significant commercial backing.

        Yes many users could make more money from patron only. Very few do in the tall world. Their primary source of income is YT. Because people don’t use the patrons.