I’m considering trying out an immutable distro after using Tumbleweed for the last 6 years.

The two major options for me seem to be Fedora Kinoite or uBlue Aurora-dx

My understanding is that universal-blue is a downstream of Fedora Atomic

So, the points in favor of Kinoite is sticking closer to upstream, however it seems like I would need to layer quite a few packages. My understanding is that this is discouraged in an rpm-ostree setup, particularly due to update time and possible mismatches with RPMFusion

uBlue Aurora-dx seems to include a lot of the additional support I’d need - ROCm, distrobox, virt-manager, libratbag, media codecs, etc. however I’m unclear how mature the project is and whether it will be updated in a timely manner long term

I’m curious what the community thinks between the two as a viable option

  • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
    0·
    5 months ago

    Distrobox updates automatically on Bluefin and Bazzite.

    In this case we disagree with Fedora, Atomic Fedora should not have Firefox in image. It does not matter to us what they do, we explicitly remove it.

    If you like the way Fedora builds their Firefox RPM, that’s all the more reason for you to use a fedora distrobox.

    I shutdown my laptop every day and update every day. That is fine for me.

    Irrelevant. Not everybody does. Some people pin an old image due to a bug and sit on a far older image. If you had it your way, they’d be using a week or month old build of Firefox – that’s unacceptable.

    Removing Firefox prevents people from reinstalling it

    Good. I can promise you if that gets fixed and I have a way to continue to prevent it, I will.

    Flatpak Firefox does not have the ability to create user namespaces for tab process isolation. This is due to all Flatpaks using the same badness-enumerating seccomp filter, there is no additional hardening possible and they still block userns creation.

    This is an issue for Mozilla. They are happy enough with the state of the Flatpak to not only verify it, but list it on their website. Unless you’ve got a CVE for the Flatpak version of Firefox I don’t see any point in even engaging with this argument.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      0·
      5 months ago

      Distrobox updates automatically

      True, forgot that you use topgrade

      Atomic Fedora should not have Firefox in image

      There are many relevant issues and it is not a clear choice.

      Irrelevant. Not everybody does.

      Yeah and nobody knows about user namespaces or seccomp filters. This is about at least 2 user groups and one is not necessarily more important than another.

      It is again not a clear choice.

      a way to continue to prevent it, I will.

      * in your opinionated images, I hope.

      You start to sound like a GrapheneOS dev. It makes no sense to prevent users from reinstalling removed packages.

      Which btw also include the Fedora Flathub repository.

      • quarterlife@lemmy.sdf.org
        0·
        5 months ago

        Which btw also include the Fedora Flathub repository.

        We no longer touch the repos as Fedora is now in agreement with using Flathub.

        You start to sound like a GrapheneOS dev. It makes no sense to prevent users from reinstalling removed packages.

        It’s for user security. I have no interest in debating this decision, my reasons are outlined.