• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    They need to advertise a legitimate use for their service.

    If they don’t have a threat from public wifi or other security concerns to remedy, then the only purpose for their service is to bypass region limits and block infringement notices. They would be considered complicit in such infringement.

    That their service also hinders efforts to stop pirates needs to be an “unintended” and “unavoidable” side effect.

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I use Proton when I’m on my university’s campus because they switched to using EDUroam for the campus wifi. I used to be a Sys Admin at a different university a while back, and from what I know, EDUroam allows the IT department to monitor basically all of the traffic over the network. I don’t know exactly how deep that stuff goes, but if I was doing anything personal or sensitive like banking or whatever, I’d flip on the VPN on my personal computer. I also don’t have any personal accounts logged in on the school issued laptop because they have it loaded with institutional spyware. Once I graduate, I’ll blank the drive and reinstall the OS to have a decent Lenovo laptop on hand as a spare.

      Edit to add: I use Proton because it was the least shady service that I could get for a reasonable price as a student. It is also helpful for finding textbooks. :)

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They can’t decrypt HTTPS unless you installed a certificate controlled by them. The only thing they can know is which domains you visited, but not what you did on it.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are plenty of legitimate uses for their services, they just aren’t things that the vast majority of people actually need. For example:

      • access things in a LAN from a WAN - i.e. access a personal PC when you’re at a friend’s house, and your home LAN is behind CGNAT
      • get around local laws - e.g. my state requires ID checks for porn and social media, so getting a VPN one state over gets around that
      • prevent ISP from seeing the sites you visit - very valid privacy concern, especially since SNI exists to de-mask TLS packets

      There are also some sketchier needs, such as:

      • get different content on your streaming platform
      • hide sharing of illegal content (i.e. piracy)
      • perform illegal transactions (e.g. going on Tor to buy drugs or whatever on the black market)

      I think VPNs are trying to appeal to more than just the above needs, they’re trying to create needs to grow their marketshare. That isn’t something a reputable VPN should do, or at least that’s something that would make me hesitate to use a given VPN.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you want to give an anonymous video to the press or the police. If you don’t hide your ip then it isn’t anonymous and they’ll come question you.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m not defending Proton. I don’t even use them.

      Edit: The region limits thing is nice though. It’s not why I got the VPN, but it’s nice to not have to pay to watch the Olympics and just watch it via the CBC or the BBC.