• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    You know what those web services do? I just click a button and it does what the button says. Why is that so hard?

    There’s also a pretty big chance that they’ll do more than what the button says, like inject malware. That’s the whole point of the article.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      I understand that but that’s beside the point. It does what they advertise. It’s incredibly simple and easy to use. Why can no one make something comparable that’s FOSS?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        They did, it’s often a CLI interface because it’s incredibly flexible. ffmpeg and imagemagick are quite easy for basic things.

        Building a cross-platform GUI is a pain, and hosting a website costs money. Building a cross-platform CLI is incredibly easy, which is why it’s so popular.

        Some of these tools have GUI frontends or alternatives, some don’t. The more niche you go, the harder it’ll be to find a reasonable GUI, and I consider PDF to JPEG pretty niche.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          CLI interface

          quite easy

          No. This does not compute.

          hosting a website costs money

          You don’t have to host a website. Just make software that works like the website and runs locally.

          I consider PDF to JPEG pretty niche.

          But not niche enough that these websites don’t exist.

          • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Making a GUI is more work than making a CLI tool. GUIs are not cross-platform, a pure CLI is more portable. You can code a CLI with any programming language you like, while there are many restrictions on what kind of GUI is available on what programming languages and platforms.

            The GUI code is tedious and boring to write. That code can become outdated and broken and might need fixing to run on newer platforms. The CLI has essentially no extra dependencies and the interface hasn’t changed much since like the 70s.

            The sort of person who develops free software usually knows and likely prefers to use the CLI. They’re not doing it for users like you, first and foremost. They’re doing it themselves, or because they need it for their job. The CLI tool might be exactly what they want, because the file conversion is part of some backend stuff, something that’s run from a script, so you can automatically run it on all the files.

            Anybody with basic web dev skills can then take these tools, slap together web fronted and try and make some quick bucks. They’re basically incentivized to not care about security, privacy or anything like that. Of course that space attracts scammers.

            The incentives just aren’t there for it to be any other way. You can either learn the CLI commands, written by people who care about their reputations and professional pride and want to share their tools. Or you can trust anonymous internet randos wanting to make a quick buck. And while I sympathize not wanting to have to learn new shit, I swear using a shell isn’t actually more complicated than using a web browser, you’re just not used to it.