schizoidman@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAnother 122.88TB SSD just launched and this one comes from an obscure Chinese startup you've probably never encounteredwww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down16
arrow-up1151arrow-down1external-linkAnother 122.88TB SSD just launched and this one comes from an obscure Chinese startup you've probably never encounteredwww.techradar.comschizoidman@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squarezecg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·1 year ago “For personal users, this SSD can store 11,000 90-minute 4K movies,” This is less useful than libraries of congress.
minus-squareWeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoI disagree. I very much want something like this at some point for media storage. One of these babies could replace all of my spinning disk drives.
minus-squareegidighsea@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoMake sure you make backups - it’s better to have multiple small drives in case of failure than one big, but in any case 3-2-1 backups!
minus-squaremac@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoI only 3-2-1 my photos and configs. No need to back up my Linux isos
minus-squareWeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoThen I guess I disagree for a different reason—the ballpark estimate definitely helped me conceptualize how far that storage would go for me.
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoIt doesn’t say the bitrate of said movies so it is indeed useless
minus-squareWeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt’s a ballpark average. The point is that it translates to “a holy shit ton of movies”. I need to store a holy shit ton of movies.
minus-squareJeffool @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYeah really. It’s been years since I saw a 90m movie.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoHonestly, that size of drive doesn’t need a comparison. This isn’t for your average user, so you don’t need to dumb it down for them.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah. My video collection tend not to be that long. Like 10mins normally.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoAlmost two years of non stop video.
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah but are there any good ones?
This is less useful than libraries of congress.
I disagree. I very much want something like this at some point for media storage. One of these babies could replace all of my spinning disk drives.
Make sure you make backups - it’s better to have multiple small drives in case of failure than one big, but in any case 3-2-1 backups!
I only 3-2-1 my photos and configs. No need to back up my Linux isos
I meant the measure quoted
Then I guess I disagree for a different reason—the ballpark estimate definitely helped me conceptualize how far that storage would go for me.
It doesn’t say the bitrate of said movies so it is indeed useless
It’s a ballpark average. The point is that it translates to “a holy shit ton of movies”. I need to store a holy shit ton of movies.
Yeah really. It’s been years since I saw a 90m movie.
Honestly, that size of drive doesn’t need a comparison. This isn’t for your average user, so you don’t need to dumb it down for them.
Yeah. My video collection tend not to be that long. Like 10mins normally.
Almost two years of non stop video.
Yeah but are there any good ones?