I changed the title from “Spying” to “Eavesdropping” because the article actually directly supports that it is “spying” on you, just not listening.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    It would cost like $1k for some YouTuber to buy a few burner android phones, slap prepaid sims in them, and then talk to them about their love of Hyundai and protein powder. It would blow the whole lid off whatever conspiracy were all just resigning ourselves to.

    Such an easy thing to test and yet there’s zero evidence that it’s happening. At least the way people assume.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      How would it even work? You would need to transmit and process mind boggling levels of data, in almost real time according to some of these stories.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Local speech to text has been easy to do for at least a decade and then you’re just firing off a text file to HQ to add keywords to a user file. These days an AI will likely parse the text to find recommendable products, ten years ago you’d have just had a gigantic list of all your partners’ brand names and desired key trigger phrases in a database and run the conversation text against the database and look for matches. Super easy to accomplish. Updating someone’s ad preferences 15-30 minutes after they talk about a product may as well be considered real time.