[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom

I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?

Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0

  • 18 Posts
  • 281 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 5th, 2024

help-circle

  • It sets an absolutely obscene precedent that a government can globally restrict information

    Again, the information is still everywhere.

    Even global terrible actors like Russia and China haven’t succeeded at that.

    Actually, the Chinese Wikipedia used to have a systemic bias in favor of the CPC before China blocked it, after which the bias was changed.

    because the entirety of Wikipedia is open source and would be mirrored in the country instantly

    It’s a bit elitist to restrict information—weapons of revolution—to those who know how to find a mirror website. Why don’t you survey the Chinese nationals in-person to see if they know how to get on Wikipedia? Plus, to avoid block evasion, no mirrors would be able to edit Wikipedia.


  • Dude, what bad does this do? To the Indian people, to you? The information has already been plastered all over the internet, including archives of said article, which anyone may access at their will and command. You want billions of Indian peoples to suffer and be deprived of intellectual revolution for what, grinding a utopic axe? Ceasing operations in India would do way more damage to Wikipedia’s goal.




  • could you link to examples of the past?

    Information is the power behind revolutions and popular democracy. I’d be surprised if the WMF didn’t check a web archive before taking down the article. The court case was already all over worldwide news before that anyways. If they took the article down from archives, that’d be a different story.

    India isn’t capable of enforcing fines against an organization that doesn’t operate in their country

    You serve a website in that country, you operate in that country. What say you about the GDPR?















  • Let’s pause — I would like to reflect on this incredible phrase, about an asset class that democratizes access to events as they unfold. See, I thought we all had access to the events of the election because we all exist in reality and can find out about them. But apparently, if we can’t gamble on an event, it isn’t happening. This is a fascinating vision of metaphysics, and I would like to hear more about it. No one bet on my birth, for instance, and thus there is no asset class relating to my existence. So am I real?