RubberDuck

Say the user defending unnecessary monitoring of kids

I asked you WHY… and you still have not answered. But at the same time attacked the tone of the message.

And if your viewpoint ignores Personal rights in favor of corporations stomping all over them you are by extension pro corp. It’s your words not mine. But sure.

Go ahead and block me… as I can’t imagine any proper answer on WHY this behavior by schools and companies should be acceptable will ever come.

Edit: “it happened to me so it must be acceptable”… Is some Stockholm level stuff you should maybe discuss with a professional. It’s the underlying reason abused kids become abusers.

That is not an explanation on why this is the case. Cowardly slinking away into the shadows is par for the course.

Just for thought:

• Is everyone free not to use them? (Does the school offer solutions for byod?)
• Can people afford to make another choice while at the same time being forced to use laptops?
• Is the type of monitoring reasonable and proportional?

I’ll bet a dollar the answer to this all is NO.

The whole pro company schtick is getting old.

Yeah, that’s just weird. Either it’s a managed device and can be used only with what is pre configured… Or the invasion of privacy is the goal. Creeping on kids… I’m in your PC reading your dm’s…

Troll… that is not an explanation on why.

What are we monitoring? How kids get dressed, if they pick their nose while using the computer?

Blocking sites does not require on device “monitoring”. Locking down a machine does not require monitoring. So why this invasive level of monitoring.

No you did not. You just stated that this was the case. I’m asking why that is/should be acceptable.

Why is it normal to put monitoring software on?
Why does a 3rd party need to monitor it?
What are they monitoring that would be considered acceptable?

I honestly ask, because I can’t think of any reason.

Or is this similar to “mass shootings are a fact of life”?

Could be if the revenue was paid out to non existing aliasses and then transferred to himself.

But getting paid royalties directly by Spotify would not need to be laundered as it’s legit money for the irs.

Why? Can you elaborate on why this is not an issue and kids should be monitored by a 3rd party?

On Twitter this should be community noted.

Not true. All they need to do is bring in “their own” people and put them on a few key positions. These Nepo babies bring with them the wrong culture and manage a company to death.

The best people see these assholes coming a mile away and jump ship. They do not get replaced (cost savings on these expensive people is huge) or get replaced by new management with sub standard hires that meet their “yes man” corporate lingo buzzword bullshit standard.

This causes the next wave of talent to leave, the death spiral is in full swing.

All this can happen in a few months. The effects might take a while to show, but I guarantee, it is hard to recover from.

Yeah, trying to evade the law… Let’s see how that works out for him. I’ll gladly see him eat crow and be held to account.

Plus, the next step would be issuing a warrant for the arrest of the person responsible. I’d welcome a warrant for Elon, as it would limit his travels a lot.

It’s perfectly valid to seize or forbid account that break the law. And if a company facilitates others to break the law you ask them to stop. In this case the company refused to… so now they are in trouble too.

If Brazil had a law that requires cars to be limited to 100km/h then they need to modify their cars to meet the law. And with ota updates do this in that country. If someone imports a car and it’s not updated even though the manufacturer knows it is in that country, they also breech the law.

Yeah… It’s like pole fucker bob has been sniffing his own farts, while the weavers are telling him his new invisible clothes look awesome.

But then, the supreme court in the US rules money is speech and this means that billionaires are very important and have much important things to say. So until the US eliminates that line of thinking, they are probably in for some more if these smegheads determining public discourse and steering the country towards their preferred cliff.

Potato/potato…

Rofl… excellent comparison between AI and loons like Elmo on the self reinforcing that leads to collapse…

I think they keep an IOT connection alive to get the data they need from the car, they just kill your enjoyment of it. What happens if it would truly drop, your guess is as good as mine.

And that is with vested manufacturers. With startups it could be much worse.

Scary to think that the answer will be no.

I have sacrificed to the case god already