legal or not it’s absolutely bonkers. Safety should be the legal assumption for marketing terms like this, not an optional extra.

or a flipped comparison operator, or a “//TODO test code please remove”

Tesla, which has repeatedly said the system cannot drive itself and human drivers must be ready to intervene at all times.

how is it legal to label this “full self driving” ?

division has no power here old man!

Kagi is working very well for me! and honestly i like that it’s a paid service.

because it aligns with their financial incentives.

but I can’t remember it

nice one! ;D

good! the number of unrecorded instances is shrinking

people still don’t, right? I cant imagine it’s very common outside of company computers

Not exactly, that would work quite differently if Fox had a news monopoly.

well, “Password1” is slightly better, I’ll make sure not to tell anyone.

nah, sha-256 is fine, though you should pick something stronger than “password”

It is built on the QtWebEngine, which is a wrapper for the Chromium browser core.

-Wikipedia

If they control the browser core they control the web, no two ways about it.

yes, they are not nearly on Googles level, not even comparably.

Secondly it’s not even primarily about that, even if it made no difference, two competing shitty companies is better than a full on monopoly.

I’m not coming from google hate, I just want there to be more than one actor, therefore I will never ever pick the largest one.

Every single time someone mentions they abandoned firefox for something “better”, it’s chromium based. Privacy is good, but the most important for me is to avoid monopoly/monoculture.

It is built on the QtWebEngine, which is a wrapper for the Chromium browser core.

-Wikipedia

It is built on the QtWebEngine, which is a wrapper for the Chromium browser core.

yeah, thats chromium bro

well it kind of is, for large companies

Why not both?