![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
The Queen/king and no one else.
The Queen/king and no one else.
I thought the concern was manipulating public perception.
But Apple isn’t buying consumer ram, they’re spending $8 to put on a different chip instead. If other laptop manufacturers are charging $50, it’s because they think they can get away with it, like apple.
Might be fun for novelty on a concert venue or ball game, but I can’t imagine it’d be economical for solar farms.
It doesn’t even cost that for them.
But this fee wasn’t there when people originally purchased this was it? If so, they will now have a less valuable product since they won’t be able to sell it as easily. Or are they only doing it for new units?
Part of it is literally named teenage engineering! The division working on the earbuds.
You heard of elsagate?
How many Mega Watts is the wave power itself? The whole project is only 20MW. A wind turbine is between 2 and 16MW depending on the size, so sounds like this would be equivalent to a few wind turbines?
You don’t think starship will be able to be reliable? I think they’ll get falcon 9 like reliability performance at least, and they’re aiming for a lot better.
I’d hope they’re paying them more, since they’re working very long hours. But I do think starship is likely to do well, they’ve crossed some huge barriers to cheap reusability.
They tried being more actively involved with the Aries I and Aries V rockets, but they got really bogged down to the point where Obama started commercial crew. Aries V eventually evolved into SLS, but with low capability and a very long schedule. And for better or for worse, SLS is getting lots of funding.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_I https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Crew_Program
Seems like he’s more involved with starship now than falcon or dragon.
US9421713B2 - Additive manufacturing method for printing three-dimensional parts with purge towers
US9592660B2 - Heated build platform and system for three-dimensional printing methods
US7555357B2 - Method for building three-dimensional objects with extrusion-based layered deposition systems
US9168698B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection
US10556381B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection
That’s like all of 3d printing, that’s pretty scary. If they win on all 5, seems like it’d kill consumer 3d printing entirely.
That’s why I was proposing using the older method that would sequester CO2 instead of emitting it.
Yeah you need to pour it differently, in thin layers. I’m guessing that extra time might make it too expensive?
Roman concrete would cure by reacting with the carbon dioxide in the air, fixing it into the concrete. It doesn’t sound like that’s how this concrete works, but I wonder if a methodology like that would be carbon negative.
Why would the lawyer defendant not know they’re interacting with AI? Would the AI generated content appear to be actual case law? How would that confusion happen?
Yeah, if the company making the ai makes false claims about it, then it’d be on them at least partially.
They were supposed to be when they started, but I think they closed up pretty fast once there was money to be made.