I thought for a sec it was significant

If we can just get it to fail completely that’d be great, if that’ll make him a non billionaire

In X’s EU user base report consisting of data from February to July 2023, Musk’s social media platform had 112.2 million monthly active users in the EU. In the following six month period from August 2023 to January 2024, that number dropped to 111.4 million users.

That’s a minuscule drop % wise

Even when AI is given search results it can struggle with anything that’s not simple. Kagi has a search integration and it references the websites, even then I often find mistakes, although much less without it.

I don’t trust LLMs without this integration

No you don’t understand, this one will say it respects your privacy

I thought chrome, yt, search, gmail/docs, android, etc. would all be separate entities, making them less willing to share data for financial reasons

I feel like this needs to be real, not a movie. Not someone who gets killed, just someone who sees their own data

You won’t, it’s a conscious trade off. Some people never put a sim or esim in their phone and have a separate dumb phone for calls, or separate hotspot

This vide explains the trade offs, reason, and approach of havjng a separate device for data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyirQOCUUK8

And this guy shares his approach of not having a sim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dei2buz1X0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83BS_mK9GE

I think generally speaking these privacy articles fail to convince the majority of people that there’s a problem, which is crucial to be able to sell the solution.

I think the abortion part is the most relatable, but you’ll hear them say they’ve got nothing to hide. I believe getting access to that data and show people what data they have on them would be the most effective. It’s like saying to someone that has nothing to hide “oh yeah? Give me your phone and your documents, let me browse what’s on them”

I hope Google gets split up, that’ll probably be the beginning of the end for targeted ads (I would hope)

How did they do it tech wise?

Interesting read. There are countries with low crime rates before this technology came to light, facial recognition doesn’t seem to be the right answer for law enforcement. I wish they’d delve in more on the privacy concerns or scenarios that might outweigh the benefits

Luis Rossman said he started buying from Ali Express because they actually sell branded supplies and do QA on their stuff (it was a reaction to Amazon selling fake products that endanger ppl)

Thank you!

100%

I tried running the standalone, ran some script from Lutris but ended up with a broken wine config. Hopefully we can at least get that working without VR at some point.

It’s the chicken and the egg problem, and most companies choose to be the chicken

There’s some moral responsibility though. When it comes to privacy though, the majority is too naive

VR works on Linux? Thru Steamvr?

LTSC? Edit: Long Term Servicing Channel. A windows enterprise version from what I gather Edit2: only the IoT LTSC version will be supported up to 2032 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/windows-10-iot-enterprise-ltsc-2021