I was once responsible for a student house (we don’t have dorms in the US sense, this is the closest we have) and I have similar experiences but less extreme. My favourite was when I had forgotten to configure DHCP filtering and someone plugged in a router the wrong way so it started offering DHCP (that didn’t work) to everyone in the building, in a race with our upstream ISP.
I needed it for a printer the other day!
Sounds like that should be assholes without cars
I tried to read the linked Twitter thread from Ars and good god it’s terrible. Half of it is people complaining about the demo version without understanding that it’s the demo version. Even though people in the thread keep explaining it to them.
In this case I think the terrible code really, as they say in fashion, completes the look
My wife talked about how Grok apparently seemed promising in AI benchmarks for a while until everyone realised the way they’re winning is by absolutely blindly outspending everyone on GPUs and brute forcing the fuck out of the problem rather than having good anything.
This seems to match that approach (and, more generally, everything Musk is doing).
This is one of the hardest earned lessons I’ve ever learned, and I’ve had to learn it over and over again. I think it’s mostly stuck now but I still make the same mistake from time to time.
As in efficient per watt or some other metric?
and Intel was releasing foxes and shit
I realise this is an autocorrect error, but it’s still funny 🦊
I’ve fallen for it too and I’m technically a security researcher depending on how you read my job description
No idea honesty, I don’t collect metrics.
I still do this!
I think this part:
Our volunteer ambassadors will [list of tasks performed]
And
Ambassadors need to [list of properties]
Along with
Bonus points if [list of properties]
Are what makes this read like a job ad for a job they’re not paying for. If they’d have posted a much shorter version with less demands, selection criteria, etc, not worded as a job ad, I’d have been a lot more charitable in my interpretation. In this case, I find it difficult to read it as anything else than “work for us, a profit-driven company, for free”.
I don’t think it’s a massive problem, but it for sure is bad communication. Ironically.
I generally don’t like this. Company fandom is bad, companies encouraging fandom is worse. Someone mentioned “but OnePlus does this!” as a counter argument and I think that’s telling something because I think they’re slimy as hell. And I had a OnePlus One and liked it.
If the assignment is so easy ChatGPT can do it, it’s too easy.
I agree, and I teach. A huge part of learning is having the time to experiment and process what you’ve learnt. However, doing that in a way that can be controlled, examined, etc, is very difficult so many institutions opt for tons of homework etc.
I’ve heard perovskite-based solar panels have less scary runoffs if they go bad but I haven’t found anything solid on that.
The public are usually very for that after it’s been implemented. They hate it before, assuming you include people who live outside the area where it’s being built but imagine they might want to some say drive there in “the public”. It’s much more of a mixed bag if you don’t.
Did not see “faster than Commodore 64!” coming!
This is a really good idea actually
Also, the times rats got into the networking room and ate random cables. I should add the network was built by volunteer students in the ‘90s.