Oh it’s simpler than that. They just go around the requirement via loopholes in the agreements. They know they’re required to give priority, so they just make the freight trains too long to fit on the side track on those routes. So if there’s a conflict, the freight train physically cannot get out of the way and the passenger one has to.

There are varying levels of moderation, and not all moderation is unpaid volunteer like lemmy and reddit. Not all moderation is just morons fighting or porn being posted where it shouldn’t. There are dedicated moderation teams that handle the worst things like child sexual abuse verification and reporting at sites like Facebook, etc. Those are pretty objective based determinations that don’t need to handle moderation criticism or concerns in any way shape or form.

Meh. SpaceX will continue on without him. Regardless of what he claims, he doesn’t run the company. Gwynne runs the company. He talks a lot of shit and focuses on a grand vision, but the engineers make it happen. At best, he’s like Steve Jobs without any of the charisma. Can’t do it himself, but is surrounded by those that can.

It sounds like it might be a good job for sociopaths. Since nearly everything I’ve read from those who have actually done that moderation is about the effect on them due to their empathy, a lack of natural empathy seems like it would be advantageous.

I wonder if there’s been a study on that.

Blood is in the water. The sharks will come to feed on the corpse. If one manages to make an alternative that can be a nearly seamless switch from WP that will probably succeed.

So just another variation of the “you’re using it wrong” excuse. Gotcha.

Because of course there’s absolutely no program a regular person outside of work could possibly need Windows for. None at all. Not a single application. Not a single game. Not a single piece of hardware they’re using (like many laptops with hardware needing specific drivers that don’t exist for linux).

Nope, absolutely nothing a regular user could have a need for Windows.

More we disagree that AI chatbots and what they generate should be considered content in the first place.

It’s content in the sense that a person is viewing the output, but what is effectively just an advanced predictive text system it is not the same as an AI generating a picture based on a prompt. There is no “artist” with an AI chatbot, even less of an “artist” than AI generated imagery.

A song or book isn’t directly interacting with you and responding to your input.

Even interactive media like a video game gives you specific choices to make that it is programmed to respond to, they do not generate a unique response to a unique input made by you.

AI chatbots aren’t like those forms of media, at all, and trying to bundle them together for convenience is ridiculously short-sighted.

When has other media been “grossly negligent” or generally responsible for the acts of the consumers?

Other forms of media don’t act like a literal human and engage in back and forth conversation in an identical format as if you were texting a friend.

If the content of the AI messages would be an issue coming from another human, it should be an issue coming from the AI. We can’t control what another person does, they are responsible for that, but we can and should control how an AI chatbot can respond and interact.

And that cost includes decades of support.

The $212 million contract includes support services from Hitachi for “20 to 25 years,” the Chronicle said.

Not officially, but nearly every device has supported hearing aids compatibility for years, well before smartphones became the standard.

DLSS is an Nvidia technology, so of course it is.

Posting as if your choice of OS is inherently superior to other choices is just pathetic.

Oh I don’t misunderstand at all. They’re preaching to the choir and thinking they’re doing something. Like idiots.

If that’s the case and I’ve somehow managed to just never see any of those threads until recently…

They might want to know that constantly saying “Windows bad, Linux good” in every thread doesn’t convert people, it just gets annoying. That in turn makes people dislike the group and dismiss what they say without a second thought, even if they’re right.

I’m just pointing out that it’s a sudden and extreme change in commentary with no ramp up. The kind of thing that in other contexts, like politics, often comes from something like a coordinated attack or disinformation scheme.

Real world testing of a new propaganda campaign system on a topic most users don’t give a shit about (Windows vs Linux), in a niche corner of the internet (Lemmy), isn’t exactly an unlikely scenario.

Yeah, but don’t get in the way of the Windows evil, Linux savior movement here on lemmy or you’ll get downvoted to oblivion. Pointing out simple facts apparently means you’re a shill.

At least that’s what I’ve seen in all the Windows posts over the last couple months. Not sure what changed from before that, but something definitely did.

Wikipedia often uses Internet Archive links for references so they don’t disappear as sites change or remove content.

Middle Manglement. Don’t forget they have to put their stink on everything to differentiate themselves.

It’s one of the main reasons ideas that do actually work at a c-suite level end up being implemented terribly in the end.