Oh my, yes, you are correct. That was sort of knee jerk, as opposed to it being the reporting party’s burden somehow. I simply cannot understand the legal gymnastics needed to punish your customers for this sort of thing; I’m tired but I feel like this is not exactly an uncommon occurrence. Anyways let us all learn from my mistake and do not be rash and curtail your own freedoms.

So in a just world, google would be heavily penalized for not only allowing csam on their servers, but also for violating their own tos with a customer?

“Bleepification” because the FCC. We live in Afghanistan apparently.

I didn’t know that! Thank you for that tidbit. Also wanna take the time to say I feel I derived more satisfaction learning of the source than I lost from the bummer.

I was trying to explain it more practically, but yes the web is a wasteland.

Yep, noscript on firefox has been available for like 15 years. And it certainly does “break” some sites as it blocks scripts by default. It can be a pain, though I consider it the safest way

As long as I can use as an radar/lidar that can see through walls, as promised.

Impressive in the most literal sense. Indeed.

Feels like news headlines are just competing for maximum cognitive dissonance. I guess that’s how you make a profit these days.

Its forbes. A rag I wouldn’t wipe my ass with it.

What’s it called when you sell something you don’t own?