Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.”

goog chief legal just being an edgelord while undermining some small things like uhhh… goog being under beck and call of an orange baby.

he didn’t really define what’s “best technologies” are – in the world.

we can say COBOL is still alive because it is the “best technology” at what it can do.

meh. all whines with no idea how they get to the next part.

class action please, so we can let our powers combine

i had to double check. yes. it is a SLAP with a silent d and a. what a great name.

i can agree at some extent why it could be at 10bits/sec.

the brain is known to do some shortcuts when parsing/speed reading but slows down when we try to extract details from written works. it is also more tiring to scrutinize details than to just read articles.

i was surprised that they got the speed measured.

good set of questions while trying to be non biased on certain topics.

for me, topics about privacy and misinformation matter more than ai. i would like them to lean more on helping me identify ai generated text and deepfakes as far as ai is concerned.

i also liked that mozilla study about smart cars so more of that is nice.

I think he already got pay-to-search and AI-infiltrated subreddits.

He’s just trying new combos.