12·
4 days agowouldn’t it be great if every war annihilated both sides? There would be no wars, if everyone knew that winning is not an option
merde alors
/s
notated as ∨
“constant performativity, brand management, status seeking” ;P
☞ “Information wants to be free”
- 1 Post
- 68 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
when dark maga goths rule media, the world is a better place
/s
if this 👇 happened in France, than of course that 👆 can happen in India
The DCRI summoned a Wikipedia volunteer in their offices on April 4th [2013]. This volunteer, which was one of those having access to the tools that allow the deletion of pages, was forced to delete the article while in the DCRI offices, on the understanding that he would have been held in custody and prosecuted if he did not comply. Under pressure, he had no other choice than to delete the article, despite explaining to the DCRI this is not how Wikipedia works. He warned the other sysops that trying to undelete the article would engage their responsibility before the law. This volunteer had no link with that article, having never edited it and not even knowing of its existence before entering the DCRI offices. He was chosen and summoned because he was easily identifiable, given his regular promotional actions of Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects in France.
the list of countries you will be leaving is long ☞ https://sh.itjust.works/post/27190154
i’m guessing that it must be like Xitter in Brazil. If a company is present in a country, they may require a legal representation which can be held accountable.
it’s more of a blackmail. Wikipedia could have kept the article online for everybody but they would have deprived 1,5 billion people in India of the whole Wikipedia.
The judge on the case stated “If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India… We will ask government to block your site”.
On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.
from that page i can switch to English ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International
In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit’s filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had “been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions”. The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing “false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency’s reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill”.
On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated “If you don’t like India, please don’t work in India… We will ask government to block your site”. In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said “I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes.”
On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.
which is what’s quoted by OP
i’ve read your comment history.
Why do you need this much hate? Some of your comments are ignorant and most are reeking of bigotry.
over oil against Iraq. And that’s a shame. Even back then “the whole west” wasn’t united behind that lie.
China isn’t Iraq.
Iran neither. Iraq was an artificial state. Iran is there in some form for more than 2 millennia. 3?
Russia is in Ukraine. Israel is, with the help of U.S. trying to start a war in “middle east”. Let’s say that China “try for Taiwan”, do you really think that the U.S. can “mobilize” effectively on all these fronts. And would Europe follow U.S.?
Another question would be, let’s say that Trump is the next president: What would that change about your world war 3 fantasies?
who is this “we” who can “bring down the wrath of god”?
capitalism may not be “the problem” but it is a problem.
or 1 in 3 aren’t on Xitter
😋
“picking up a dictionary” :)
i probably have a dozen kilograms of dictionaries. i don’t remember the last time i picked one up.
i have 3 of these installed in addition to a Wiktionary interface.
“i don’t work here.”
i’m just a lemming sharing information. Linked page above is for your answers.
suit yourself
it was a reply to “Now would be a good time to start a line of headwear that has infrared leds to shield your face from cameras.”
i won’t buy it but it’s already out there. He probably produces them alone and can’t sell them for less than that.
If you’ve got the time, diy; if you’ve got more money than time, $168 may be preferable. There are people who won’t be making that much money this month, there are others who buy media platforms as a hobby for $44000000000 🤷
🤦