To be vulnerable to what?
To be vulnerable to what?
Firewall on everything gonna block that lol
Going to rely on security through obscurity instead?
Someone doesn’t like apple
This made me lol, thanks
Removed by mod
Or /home/me/drive
What the fuck is up with all these docker comments?
Check your binaries, might not be the right ones for your platform/ubuntu version
I thought it was bird flu awareness
That’s a good one
At the end of the day the performance of a performance oriented filesystem matters. Without performance, it’s just complexity
The two works can live harmoniously together in the same repo, therefore, not incompatible by one definition and the one that matters.
There’s already big organisations doing it and they haven’t had any issues
Keen to see how Canonical goes. There’s another one or two distros doing the same. Maybe everyone will wake up and realise they have been fighting over nothing
There’s no requirement for them to apply to the same file? There’s already blobs in the kernel the gpl doesn’t apply to the source of
Not true
The only condition is that CCDL and GPL don’t apply to the same file. Wifi works just fine and the source code isn’t GPL yet wifi drivers are in the kernel…
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2094/are-cddl-and-gpl-really-incompatible
Like this that states there is no issue https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/2094/are-cddl-and-gpl-really-incompatible
Cow is an excuse for writing performance, though the read is awful too currently
Improvement is nice to see, still not ready for prime time
Okay thanks for your comment?
I could similarly link you an internet search for http or tls vulnerability, I fail to see your point