• tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It does sound like most of that was not actually manufacturing, but design.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If you’re referring to the 13&14th Gen chips then yes, Intel is saying it’s on the software side.

        But if you’re talking about 10th Gen chips that took forever to get out of the gate due to issues with sub 14nm lithography, then no it’s a hardware issue. Intel has had issues over recent years with actual die shrinks.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Regardless, it feels like what we see with Boeing. A company culture that prioritized marketing and time to market over everything else consequences be damned.

          Move fast and break stuff is probably not the best strategy if you are building airplanes or processors or other PhD level stuff… Or maybe it’s just never a good strategy.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah nice fast and break things is a great way to maximize short term profits at the expense of the long term. But fuck it, I got mine in the short term, so it works.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          If you’re referring to the 13&14th Gen chips then yes, Intel is saying it’s on the software side.

          Yes, I was, but there was also some initial manufacturing issue with oxidation. That wasn’t the bulk of the issues that they were running into, though.