I’m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

  • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I really love NixOS and use it on all my devices. Its not as difficult as people say and it really makes the linux experience a piece of cake once you get it down.

    The single config file to control almost everything is just what I was looking for in linux and the fact that it solved any kind of dependency hell I have experienced in the past is huge. If I had to list a top 3 it would be NixOS, Fedora, and Arch.

    • Paper Plane@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah. It’s a pretty good linux distro for Beginners. It was my first distro tho. 😁

      • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m sorry but it’s not great for beginners. It’s a rolling bleeding edge distro that does not break often but when it does you need to know how stuff works to fix it.

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    18 days ago

    I use Arch for personal and gaming, Debian for self hosting and hacking, Alpine for containerized cloud deployments.

    • I use Arch for personal and gaming, Debian for self hosting and hacking, Alpine for containerized cloud deployments.

      Pretty much the same for me: bleeding-edge Arch for my workstation, rock-stable Debian for my server.

  • esteemedtogami @lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 days ago

    I just installed Bazzite about a month ago and love it! Used Ubuntu in the past and it was ok, but eventually went back to Windows. I definitely don’t feel that way about Bazzite though, I think I might stick with it as my primary OS!

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Nobody has mentioned immutables yet?!

    I finally dipped my toes into trying a new distro over the summer and have been really impressed with Project Bluefin. All the familiarity of Gnome for existing Ubuntu or Debian users but with a completely hands off rolling update experience.

    The main drawbacks are the slight complexity of how the fuck to install stuff on an immutable system. In theory you use Homebrew for CLI apps and flatpak for GUI apps but I’m really not a fan of installing from sources other than the original dev.

    • Breadhax0r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Bazzite is immutable, it worked generally okay for me but I swapped back to mint because I had to use a smart card reader and getting it to work on an immutable was a royal pain

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    I use Gentoo and I love it. The installation process is a bit more complex than Arch but it doesn’t have to be if you choose the precompiled kernel.

    The package management is extremely flexible and the community are great. I have a morning routine where I log onto my gentoo desktop before work and update everything; would compare it to raking one of those miniature buddhist sand gardens. Very theraputic!

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      Have got Debian on an old thinkpad too because it is too under resourced to compile everything. I think Debian is amazing for a solid, reliable distro if you have weak hardware.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 days ago

    Debian for my daily workstation. Minimal terminal-only install, and then I piece together my environment.

    For smaller, headless applications I like Alpine. Containerized projects, VPS, etc.

    • Paper Plane@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      Okay. What are your thoughts of KISS linux? It’s pretty minimalistic and have a very tiny package manager which is written entirely in Bash script.

        • lnxtx@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          KISS-ish. Default init is systemd. Debian also provides customized configuration of services.

          Building a deb package isn’t that straightforward as Arch’s PKGBUILD.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’m unfamiliar with KISS. I don’t really distro hop, since what I use has satisfied all my needs to date.

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Why are fedora and suse often not mentioned considering theyre not forks of anything? (as far as im aware)

      • lancalot@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Historically, (at least for hobbyists/enthusiasts) Fedora and openSUSE have been a lot less popular compared to Arch, Debian and their derivatives. While not necessarily representative, Boiling Steam’s chart -in which ProtonDB’s data is used- does indicate to this as well.

        Just my 2 cents.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Kinda crazy considering fedoras perks and accessibility tbh. Dont know much ab suse tho as i have very little experience with it

          • lancalot@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            I don’t know why, but openSUSE has had difficulty garnering popularity overall (aside from Germany).

            A possible explanation, which also ties in to Fedora, is how both are the open source variants to corporate distros; SEL and RHEL respectively.

            Arch and Debian are more community-driven by comparison.

            For Fedora specifically, people couldn’t regard it as anything but a testing bed distro; especially if you see how back2back they were with adopting new technologies like PulseAudio, systemd, Wayland, GTK 3/4, PipeWire etc. To be fair, openSUSE was the first to default to Btrfs and auto-snapshotting with Snapper*. Fedora was also facing competition from industry darling CentOS; similar code base, but a lot more stable.

            Thankfully, since a couple of years now, Fedora has recognized that it’s not cool to expect your user base to be sadistic. And together with the (unfortunate) downfall of CentOS, Manjaro and Ubuntu - Fedora has amassed a very healthy user base. And with how quickly Bazzite is becoming the face of gaming Linux (at least until Valve releases SteamOS), I don’t think it has even peaked yet.

  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Fedora Atomic, especially Bluefin, Bazzite and Aurora.

    Nearly unbreakable, very reliable and stable in everyday use, needs no maintenance (updates itself, etc.) and more!

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 days ago

    Fedora, but I wouldn’t say I’m in love with it. It frustrates me the least. No Linux distro is perfect, but they’re all better than Windows.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 days ago

    If there were a universal answer to this, there wouldn’t be any others.

    I myself currently use Debian (testing), have for some years now, but I have used other distros in the past too.