• Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Now I’m frightened to my core.

    AI doesn’t scare me.

    People making decisions off of AI scare me.

    The government mandating people use AI to make decisions frightens me to my core.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      AI should scare you. People will just dump everything on AI and then let it fuck over your life. What happens if AI flags you as a terrorist and your drivers license is suspended, or your health care is cancelled? What happens if AI says you’re fraudulently collecting social security? There’s nobody to blame, because they’ll just blame the computer.

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the crux of my statement, yes.

        AI doesn’t scare me.

        How people respond to it scares me

        And that it’s being prepared to drive/copilot government agencies scares the everliving shit out of me.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          You are both blind. Be scared of the combo and stfu. It’s evil people with software that helps them. It’s history all over again. Not complicated. Stop arguing and fucking stop them

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      So far the Trump administration and the Federal government under him don’t need AI to justify stupid, globe-wrecking policy.

      AI told me to do [wrongful action] is no more a valid excuse than I was just following orders. At least not to an international tribunal or a (seriously peckish) public.

        • pajam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I was gonna say, it certainly allows insurance companies to launder their original intentions as “oopsy, AI made us deny all those claims (we wanted to deny anyway), don’t be mad at us” and then people bitch about the bad AI causing all these issues instead of the insurance company who wanted the exact same outcome, regardless of AI.

          All that said, I’m giving another recommendation that people go subscribe to Citations Needed.

  • dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    5 days ago

    Now they just use LLM to generate formulas to calculate tariffs that fit their fantasy. Gosh I wish they actually taste their own failure for once not just constantly fail up.

        • 0xD@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Because it’s a naive take. Technology can help us make the world a better place for all - standing in the way are greedy pigs and asshole, ignorant politicians.

          “AI” isn’t the problem, our approach to it is.

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Kinda sorta.

            AI, or rather LLMs, can barf out a lot of passable text quickly. That can be useful as a starting point for something useful, if a human mind is willing and able to review and repair it. It’s like having an idiot intern.

            But the number of people who use LLMs in a way that reflects and understanding of their limitations is diminishingly small. Most people just don’t assume that something that looks valid needs to be fully and critically reviewed. That’s why we’ve had multiple cases of lawyers having ChatGPT write theis legal briefs based on hallucinated legal precedent.

            • 0xD@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              That’s not a problem of the technology though, that’s human idiocy.

              • deathbird@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                On the one hand, absolutely, human idiocy.

                On the other hand, as a society it behooves us to thenk about how to stop idiots from hurting themselves and others. With IT, and in the context of corpo marketing hype, I am deeply concerned about politicians using AI or allowing AI to be used to do things poorly and thus hurt people simply because they have too much faith in the tool or its salesmen. Like, for example, rewriting the Social Security database.

          • base@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            show me that magic llm which doenst infringe the copyright of nearly everybody, which doesnt have an unprecedentet impact on the enviroment to train and run, which wont be used to cut of people from their income, which isnt owned by technocratic billionaire assholes, which isnt peddled and promoted by fascist goverments, which doesnt halluzinate, which isnt a blackbox, which actually works and doesnt fail at the simplest tasks sometimes, which doesnt infringe my privacy(allegedly tbf, but you know). the list goes on.

            sure, sure technology itself isnt evil. but thats not a hill i want to die on in case of llms. they’re problematic on so many levels. full stop. i dont think its a naive take to have some skepticism against this clusterfuck. potentially some technologies could make the world a better place. but llms dont fit into this category.

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    If the safeguards can be so easily removed, what’s the point of putting them there in the first place

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Never attribute to AI that which can be adequately explained by incompetence.

      If you dig in to the tariff calculation, it’s simply trade deficit / 2, the other two variables are constants that cancel eachother out. AI would probably do a better job making a complex algorithm, this is just a lazy human adding some flourishes to BS their way through.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    AI is wrong so often this is extremely scary.

    They can also do evil things and “blame” it on AI.

  • 5in1k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ibm helped the holocaust. AI companies will do the same now.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t necessarily oppose the use of AI as a tool for humans to utilize, but I do have issues with it dictating policies or control over human beings. By the people, for the people, absolutely does not include AI. (Sorry Data, not yet)

    Also, any prompts and prompt instructions should be public with results. It is just way too easy to fuck up.

  • klobuerschtler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just another attempt to rob American workers of their dignity. Workers of the US, you have been played!

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    AI keeps sending funding to the asteroid detection guy, the DNA vaccine people, the bee people and other climate change people too. It wants to send money to the education department but we fixed that! We’re so good at AI! Oh look, it keeps saying stuff about Louisiana under water! Crazy! Let’s fix that!