• michael@lemmy.chrisco.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep we have different lemmy/mastodon/etc… instances talking with one another. Anyone can set up something like activityhub. Its a fun place in my opinion!

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          enjoy the mainstream memes and discussion, but avoid the algorithmic content slop from them. That’s how I see the fediverse. It’s a win in my book.

    • BCX@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ehhhh, the OG internet connected better because all nodes were well connected. The Fediverse is a series of single servers that can’t even sync all data across themselves. It’s cute, but it’s post-it notes on strings atm

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      No. The fediverse is just more of the same mindless gargling and regurgitation of mainstream media excrement that the internet has become, but federated.

      It lacks the creativity, originality, experimentation, wonder, sheer life of the old internet.

      It’s just as dead, enshittified, and riddled with misinformation bots as everything else.

    • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Fediverse is a bit more like the old USENET days in some regards, but ultimately if it ever becomes more popular the same assholes that ruin other online experiences will also wind up here.

      What made the Internet more exciting 30 years ago was that it was mostly comprised of the well educated and dedicated hobbyists, who had it in their best interest to generally keep things decent. We didn’t have the uber-lock-in of a handful of massive companies running everything.

      It’s all Eternal September. There’s no going back at this point — any new medium that becomes popular will attract the same forces making the current Internet worse.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        if it ever becomes more popular the same assholes that ruin other online experiences will also wind up here.

        That’s kind of the glory of the fediverse, though. We can have communities using the same protocol that never interact with each other.

        There can be completely separate fediverses that cater to different people.

      • Rob200@lemmy.autism.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Fediverse by design prevents this, while the internet of the old age had little if any guardrails against this specially since the platforms never really federated with another.

        Did forum sites even federate? One forum sites would be dead and the next would have more activity. But what if the other forum with less activity was the one you wanted to use? The old internet was a good start but there’s a reason why it’s dominated by Instagram and Facebook, while email, you can use mostly any provider and not feel like you’re left out.

        • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Fediverse by design prevents this, while the internet of the old age had little if any guardrails against this specially since the platforms never really federated with another.

          I see someone is too young to remember USENET.

        • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          It’s what happened to the internet. Devices were dumbed down to make the internet accessible for everyone. Now the “normies” are also on the internet, whereas in the past they’d belittle you for spending time on the computer.

          In time, the Fediverse will also be easily accessible. And where there are normies, you’ll find corporate enshittification.

          Edit: thanks for the downvotes because I explained the word “normification”. You’re overthinking this. It’s a term that has been around since before Reddit became popular. It’s a term that stems from 4chan. I don’t like the term, I just explained it. And yes, the corpos are to blame but they couldn’t do the things they do without a certain user base. And that’s not your typical tech savvy user base. How is that so difficult to understand?

          • Nima@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m not sure that categorizing people as “normies” is a great idea. nor is it a way to entice new people and voices to join and learn how to use the fediverse so that it can become a more reliable place.

            i think blaming enshittification on “normies” is a lot easier than holding greedy corporations accountable for directly making everything worse. it’s surely easier, but the real issue remains unchecked.

            if anything, it’s a good thing that more people are learning how much better the fediverse is. it helps the fediverse get stronger, not weaker.

            “us” vs “them” is not a mindset that will produce anything except cesspools of toxicity. at least imho.

            • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              blaming enshittification on “normies”

              What’s really annoying is it’s straight out of the corpo playbook.

              “We’re not responsible for ______, you are because you didn’t do enough ________”.

              The most blatant is “global warming” and “ate too much meat/didn’t recycle enough/made poor choices with your car” and so on.

              It’d be nice if people would stop trying to blame the worst offenses being perpetuated on people by billionaires and their pet corporations on personal choices, because it’s hot liquid bullshit.

            • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I didn’t coin the term and I too believe it’s a huge generalization. However, “simpler” people are more susceptible to ads. The “normies” in question are the ones that don’t use adblockers, they believe ads are normal and they believe ads don’t affect them. Corporations capitalize on that. Better tech education would definitely help take some power away from corporations.

              Edit: even now you’ll find people that use Lemmy apps that have ads. The bigger the user base, the more greedy companies will find ways of exploiting the Fediverse.

              • Nima@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Better tech education would definitely help take some power away from corporations

                If you truly believe that, then vilifying more “simple” and less tech-savvy individuals is not the way to do it. Don’t be angry that they click on ads. Be angry that they’ve been poisoned to think that behavior is normal on the internet.

                Education is absolutely possible for those new to things like the fediverse. But education doesn’t work when you use those labels for people. It widens the gap, it doesn’t close it.

              • xavier666@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I was a normie once. I too fell for misinformation in the past. If it wasn’t for the freely available information on the internet, I wouldn’t be here today.

                • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You went ahead and actually gathered the correct information. This is not what the “normies” in question do. Look, I didn’t coin the term nor do I approve of the use of this term. I just wanted to explain what the other person meant with “normification”.

          • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            normies

            Honestly some normies would help us talk about something different than US politics, linux and being trans femboys. Honestly, we’d have some diversity in content. I’d like that.

            • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think it would make discussions about US politics even worse. But I agree with the rest. I personally would also like to have a more broad user base. That’d definitely spark more interesting discussions. Lemmy is a very weird echo chamber right now. It’s just very important that no one in the Fediverse starts to capitalize on them. That’d be the moment enshittification starts. And that will happen once the mainstream people come pouring in because greed will always corrupt the ones who have some form of power. Someone will take advantage of this.

          • henfredemars@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            With community visibility, there is plenty of room to form these communities that regular people can’t access for those who want that.

            I can imagine an instance with a whole collection of insider communities. In fact, it’s already happened.

      • Rob200@lemmy.autism.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is this some kind of attack on certain minority groups or am I over thinking this comment? I googled what normification meant and the results gave me some bad vibes regarding this comments direction.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not an attack on certain minority groups unless you consider “normal average person” a minority group.

          It’s just a little bit of the old nerd superiority complex leaking out with a new word attached to it.