• lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    4k is enough, 60fps is enough, no smart or AI stuff is perfectly fine…

    What about reducing the energy consumption? That’s an innovation I want.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I hope you mean 60hz is enough for TVs. Because I certainly don’t want that regression on my monitor 😄

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        6 days ago

        Totally agree. Huge difference when moving windows or gaming on a 120 Hz or higher monitor. So smooth.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              When I tried a game that had a 120hz mode, I had to lower the quality a little to get it work well, but didn’t notice a big difference, but there was a difference.

              A few days later I went back to 60hz so i could increase the graphics quality , and the difference was crazy huge. I had to go back to 120hz.

              • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Just give it an hour or two and your brain won’t give a shit about 60 hz anymore.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            Honestly you will. You probably never compared the two side by side.

            It’s incredibly apparent, you think it’s smooth but then when you go over to 120 Hz and then go back the difference is very apparent.

            • escapeVelocity@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The forbidden comparaison.

              People live happily untill they do it. Than … Than they can’t ever go back . It’s a curse.

              Don’t taste the forbidden fruit

            • mirisgaiss@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I had a 980ti for AGES that could do 120hz at 1080. got a big 4k screen, immediately had to upgrade the gpu because it wouldn’t do 4k at anything higher than 60hz. even moving the mouse across the screen felt sluggish.

          • lukaro@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I notice the difference between 60 an 72hz but only after a few hours when i either get or don’t have a headache from using 60hz. Visually I see no difference.

        • scala@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          120hz on my 4k 75in TV. Didn’t bother connecting it to WiFi. It’s a dumb TV now

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      Are you aware that reducing the energy consumption on monitors is competely irrelevant compared to the giant data centers coming up now, taking as much as power as a full city?

      One typical AI data center ≈ 1 TWh/year ≈ the electricity used by 100 000 average homes annually.

      A very large AI data center under construction ≈ 20 TWh/year ≈ electricity for ~2 million homes annually.

      Fun times isnt it.

      • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        I personally do reject that kind of thinking.

        “But others are worse” reminds me of the kindergarten…

        EU has introduced energy efficiency levels for monitors based on the potential and we are far from the goal.

        I can’t tear down AI data centers, but I can choose to buy a monitor that does not heat up my living room and leads to a nicer electricity bill for me.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        By that logic, I should go out and just start a murder spree, because people die anyway so whats the point.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    7 days ago

    I want a dumb tv with the price and and specs of a smart tv. Less is more

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      What you’re looking for are commercial screens. They’re a bit more expensive for a comparable panel, as they are intended for 24/7 use- but are about as dumb as they get nowadays.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        A bit more expensive? I was able to get a smart tv for like 800 bucks. The same equivalent dumb tv would have been a few thousand dollars and Best Buy said they would only sell it to business accounts which was infuriating to read.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 days ago

          This isn’t a peasant TV. And it doesn’t even have any tracking, I am not sure a pleb can even legally own these. Sorry, but you have to be a wealthy person who watches CP to have it in your home.

    • avg@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      You would likely have to pay more since they aren’t getting to sell your information.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        *you would have to pay more because major companies know they can charge more. There isn’t a limited amount of profit a company wants to mae, and then they pick a price from that, they price it as high as the market will bear.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Realistically, not only do I not want an 8k tv, but I might not get a tv at all, if I had to do it today. We rarely watch tv anymore. The brainrot is the same but we’re much more likely to use individual screens

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      My LG C3 not connected to internet and using an HTPC and Nvidia shield is working great so far.

      • webhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know why more people don’t do this. Don’t connect the TV to the Internet. Ever. Do updates using a flash drive if you must and connect whatever flavor streaming box you like. The TVs and their dumb os get slow and shitty anyway so why fuck around with it? Lol.

        • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ppl spend so much time fucking around with Android slop boxes and I’m just like…how is using a full fat linux desktop PC under the TV with a wireless trackpad keyboard clunky? Set display scale to 200%, install Stremio, and now you can game and shitpost on your couch too as a bonus.

          • webhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s mostly because all the streaming services won’t give you higher res and HDR unless you’re using one of the boxes. You don’t need the slop tho. Nvidia shield imo has been solid for over a decade now. I’m over fire TV and those cheap shitty no name boxes are even worse. I have no idea why people fuck with those. Even a fire TV is better than that lol.

    • drgeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I just recently found out about Thomson’s “Easy TVs” LINK

      Actual dumb TVs, with a good range on inputs and at a cheap price, they seem to be aimed at hotels and such.

      The downside is that they only do 1080p at 40" or 43" but the appeal of getting one before they disappear from the market is strong (also I don’t have any 4k media in my library so my worry is more about future proofing than any current necessity)

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    For the majority of people a 1080p60 with a high bitrate and 10+ bit color space will look absolutely perfect. Some can pixel peep and tell, but more people still struggle seeing when the aspect ratio is wrong on their TV.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    TV manufacturers salivated at the idea of TV resolution, hoping desperately to turn the TV market into something like the PC market, in that you have to upgrade every 5ish years to stay on top of technology and use the latest stuff to artificially increase sales beyond what their already abysmal build qualities provide them.

    I’m glad the plan is failing spectacularly.

    Hopefully this forces them to think more about quality and start focusing on TVs that actually last now… You know, like we used to have 30 years ago.

  • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s because the answer isn’t higher resolutions, it was legally enforcing h.265 to be open source. Now the solution is AV1, but video codecs shouldn’t be locked down like that.

    To act like that was ever in favor of “protecting the sciences” is a fucking joke.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck.

    Now instead of each new generation of TVs being slightly higher in resolution some god damn business tech executive is going to focus on some god damn bullshit to try and change or add which is going be absolutely fucking ridiculous or pointless and annoying like AI television shit or TV gaming or fuck my life. Smart TVs are bad enough but they can’t help themselves they need to change or add shit all the fucking time to “INNOVATE!!!” and show stockholder value.

    Resolution was something easy and time consuming but we can’t rely on that keeping them from fucking TV up any more.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeahhhhh 8K is going to be pretty far off considering we still get 1080p “enhanced” trash with YoutubeTV for sports games. It looks like ass on my good, 4K TV. I can’t imagine that on an 8K display.

    Though some sports - like the Unrivaled games on HBO - are of a higher quality, you just don’t get that everywhere.

    And that’s just sports. Couple that with the fact that some people still have data caps, and I just don’t see widespread adoption any time soon.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    At a certain point yours eyes can’t tell much difference. It is like music, people would obsess over tweaking their stereo systems to the point where I doubt you could physically tell the difference, it was mostly imagined.

    Huge tvs also require big rooms to make the viewing angle work. Not everyone has a room they work in. Apartments are especially too small for huge tvs.

  • Dirty AnCom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    What’s interesting to me is that film is roughly, perceptually around 8K. However, very very few people have cinema-sized screens in their home, so what’s the point if it’s “only” even 80 inches?

    I think giant 8K monitors are still useful for productivity, but only for a small number of people. I personally like having multiple monitors over one big one.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Most developing countries have cheap 1080p TVs right now, but others are still using CRTs, and still others are watching on their phones (like some of my poorer relatives who do get their entertainment fix through their phones while the big TVs in their living rooms rarely gets turned on).

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think my TV is like 32" and 720p from 2012 or so. It’s fine.

      Before that I had a projector which was fun sometimes but mostly too big for the room. Cool to take psychedelics and run a visualizer while it was pointed along the floor at you. You could feel the fractals on your skin. I don’t do that anymore, so a 32" TV is fine.

      • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My TV is a 50" I think? 1080p from 2013. It was cheap then, and it’s worth nothing now, on the market. But it works fine.

        The backlight is evenly distributed, which is good, that’s a pet peeve of mine. But otherwise it’s unremarkable.

        Honestly, I’d really like to try those new HDR TVs, a mini LED or OLED or something. But I just can’t justify it. Why? Because the TV I have, works fine 🤷‍♂️

        If it magically died tomorrow, I’d upgrade. But I definitely don’t need 8k. Heck I don’t need 4k. I barely watch any content at 1080, it’s mostly 720 🤷‍♂️

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Getting rid of my tv was the best thing I did for myself. That’s the future. Removing and reducing all screen time.

  • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only real innovation after 1080p for TV was HDR, sound stuff, 60-120hz, and upscaling to 4k.

      • jestho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Only time I used 3D on my TV was playing Black Ops split-screen, where both players got the full screen, which was pretty neat.