• cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    383
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is he talking about, public WiFi can easily poison and monitor your DNS requests (most people don’t know or use encrypted DNS), and there’s still tons of non-https traffic leaks all over the place that are plain text. Even if encrypted, there’s still deep packet inspection. VPNs can mitigate DPI techniques and shift the trust from an easily snoopable public WiFi to the VPN’s more trustworthy exit servers.

    This guy really needs to elaborate on what he’s trying to say when the cyber security field very much disagrees with this stance. I’m not a huge fan of Proton, but they aren’t doing anything wrong here. You should use it for public Wi-Fi.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yup. You can grab any unencrypted data passed between the user’s browser and a server literally out of thin air when they’re connected to an open access point. You sit happily at the Starbucks with your laptop, sniffing them WiFi packets and grabbing things off of them.

      Oh and you have no idea what the myriad of apps you’re using are connecting to and whether that endpoint is encrypted. Do not underestimate the ability of firms to produce software at the absolute lowest cost with corners and walls missing.

      If I was someone who was to make money off of scamming people, one thing I’d have tried to do is to rig portable sniffers at public locations with large foot traffic and open WiFi like train stations, airports, etc. Throw em around then filter for interesting stuff. Oh here’s some personal info. Oh there’s a session token for some app. Let me see what else I can get from that app for that person.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Oh nice. Just gotta dress em up like Unifi or Aruba then stick em up on the ceiling.

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep, my partner gave one for my birthday, it’s basically plug-and-play. It can automatically harvest credentials, spoof captive portals, etc. I bet that in most places nobody would question something like this hanging on the ceiling indeed.

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        We need a switch like Firefox has that disallows anything non-HTTPS, but from the phone level. Companies like Apple and Google could also eventually warn apps that they’re going to make it the default setting.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Apps don’t use the system browser to connect to REST endpoints. Neither do they use the OS. Apps typically use a statically linked library. There are use cases for HTTP-only connections so it’s unlikely that those libraries would mess with forcing or even warning its users that they’ve used HTTP instead of HTTPS. Point is Google and Apple can do little in this regard. Unless they scan apps’ source code which could be possible to some extent but still difficult because URLs are often written in pieces.

          • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Sure, I didn’t say they use the system browser - I said the opposite. I’m saying the OS should be able to block non-HTTPS connections. If you have control of the OS you can control what protocols are used by apps, unless I’m missing something.

            What cases are there for non-HTTPS? I can’t think of any. It’s 2024. All communication should be encrypted.

            • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The OS interfaces provided to apps (generally POSIX) have no idea what HTTP is. They’re much lower level than that. If an OS is to control what protocols are used by apps, it has to offer some functionality that does HTTP for the apps and apps have to use it. Unfortunately the only way to force that would be to disable the general OS interfaces so that apps can’t just use existing libraries that use those. If you did that your OS would become useless in other ways that rely on the basic interfaces.

              The other way the OS could do anything about it is to inspect network traffic going over its network interfaces. That would be a significantly different can of worms and it’s not free in terms of processing power and therefore battery. Then you’d have the screams of privacy people that Android or iOS is looking at all network traffic.

              So all in all, the OS isn’t very well suited to police application level protocols like HTTP. At least not on devices whose primary purpose isn’t network traffic related.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also, any unlatched, unfirewalled vulnerabilities you have are immediately available to anyone on that local WiFi network. One thing VPNs may do is cause you to ignore requests from systems on the local network, which helps.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s an interesting one. I know it depends on configuration, but in the run-of-the-mill case, does connecting through VPN stop local services to listen on local IPs? I know our corpo VPN kills local LAN access but I’m curious what the default for OpenVPN/Wireguard might be.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How is DPI a problem if it’s encrypted? That would only work if the attacker had installed their CA cert on your client machine, right?

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m doing DPI on my own network and I can still view TLS certificate fingerprints and some metadata that provides a good educated guess as to what a traffic flow contains. It certainly better that it’s encrypted, but there is a little information that leaks in metadata. I think that’s what was meant.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          True, but this is generally not useful information to anyone. They can see you’re visiting bank.com, but they still can’t see your bank details.

          It might be useful if they’re trying to target you for phishing, but a targeted attack is extremely unlikely.

          Also, any wireless equipment from the past 15 years or so supports client isolation.

          • groet@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Client isolation doesn’t help. That is just the access point not routing traffic between connected devices. The problem with WiFi is it is a radio signal. Everybody in range can receive 100% of all communication on that network. Just by being in range the attacker can do passive sniffing. No wiretap needed like with cabled networks.

            WiFi is encryoed if it uses a password. So any public WiFi without a password can be sniffed by literally every device in range (no need to connect to the WiFi for sniffing). On public WiFi with a password, the radio signal is encrypted but everybody knows the encryption key. So everybody connected to the WiFi can still sniff the traffic of everybody else.

            That encryption is only on the WiFi level, so encrypted radio signals, not on the actually traffic level (like TLS/HTTPS etc).

      • orange@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think it might be confusion between inspecting plaintext metadata like SNI vs actually inspecting encrypted contents (e.g. HTTPS content, headers, etc.).

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Dpi only works if they install a cert on your phone. Else they can’t crack it (in real time) or you would receive HTTPS errors

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You dont need to examine the contents of http traffic to do what many services call DPI.

        you can still read unencrypted traffic, like most DNS. Or even without that, you can frequently tell from the endpoint IP who someone is talking to, and what types of applications from port numbers used. Etc.

        If you’re torrenting, for example, that’s pretty easy to see.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Still not DPI. Regardless of what other manufacturers or devs call it.
          At best it’s a network monitor. Literally pihole can give you most of those stats as well.

    • Fontasia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, while it is true, lots of VPN companies are grifts just buying VPS’s and installing OpenVPN, this “Cyber security expert” puts far too much faith in HTTPS and probably never seen a lecture from the Black Hat conference

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        probably never seen a lecture from the Black Hat conference

        Not defending Robert Graham because I’m also eyebrow raising his statement. And while you may be 100% correct that he never actually stayed to listen to a lecture, he absolutely spoke at a lot of them since 2000.

        https://infocondb.org/presenter/robert-graham

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Many VPNs using OpenVPN is…fine.

        The value adding is the VPN infrastructure they’re providing. You can’t just install the standard OpenVPN client and expect it to DO anything without some kind of service.

        True on the HTTPS thing.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not even an expert in this stuff, but with a tool I found online I demonstrated that it was easy to snoop people’s passwords on my school’s wifi networks back in the day. It took minutes.

          • 5dh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m sorry, but I don’t believe it is. Nearly all traffic is TLS. When this is attacked, you’d get TLS error. Am I missing something?

            • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              There exist plenty of services on school campuses that send passwords in plaintext. There are services outside of school campuses that do, too. Hell, I’ve been able to bypass 2FA checks by just navigating around them, I don’t know what else to tell you, not everything out there uses the best security practices, so don’t assume that they do.

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      most people don’t know or use encrypted DNS

      But a cybersecurity expert does. That’s the point. If you know those things, VPNs become obsolete, for most people. So why not teach people about it, instead of promoting VPNs?

      And can you really trust an extremely profit focused company, that is built on user data, more than your local Café? If you’re in China, sure, use a VPN, they’re the lesser evil. But most spots don’t have the resources or expertise to analyze and sell or otherwise misuse your logs. VPN companies not only do, most rely on it.

      If you’re a highly targeted person, it’s another story, but in that case your only hope is Tor or a new identity.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          But Proton Bad? I don’t understand. The armchair security nerds on Lemmy want me to hate something.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I agree here. It’s clear that some people here really want me to be outraged at SOMEONE, but dont seem to really understand who or why.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So why not teach people about it, instead of promoting VPNs?

        Ok then, in the meantime the rest of us will use a fucking VPN? I don’t know what “encrypted DNS” means, and I’m 99% you’re going to respond with either “whaaaaat you don’t know something that 99.999% of other people also don’t know? Clearly you are too dumb for the internet” or else “oh sure I’d be glad to explain that! It’s real simple, see when you have a Rosendin gembal, it befrazzles the gesticulators of your brangles (link to a Wikipedia article on brangles). So you just have to re-delineate the scanditrons to break the tensor lines in your scintrins! You can code a fairly simple app from scratch to do it, and there’s a FOSS program someone made to help you identify the cabangs in your computer’s lenticles: (link to a github page that is literally just a transcription of an eldritch god screaming in binary)”

        VPNs are extremely user friendly and they are happy to explain in layman’s terms exactly what they do and how they work. If there’s a better way, it’s locked behind years of techie knowledge.

        • Lucy :3@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          And most users don’t know what a VPN is. In both cases, they’re not gonna learn anything about it. Except you need to pay for a VPN, after figuring out which one is kinda trustworthy instead of snakeoil, while encrypted DNS is a simple setting on any OS. Nothing more. You don’t need whole articles to explain what your product does and why you respect privacy and blah, while not saying a single word that’s true. It’s a simple setting. VPNs are not only user friendly, they’re a full ripoff for most people and snakeoil. They don’t explain what they do in “laymans terms”, most of them just blatantly lie. Anything for the cash. If you want an explanation of encrypted DNS:

          A DNS is kind of like your GPS. It translates an address into something more usable, e.g… like your GPS translates ‘123 Baker Street, Washington’ into coordinates, so you can use it on a map, for example. A DNS does the same, but for the internet: It translates “google.de” into a format that is actually readable and usable to the computer. However, to translate “google.de” you need to reach out to someone else, that knows the address. The thing is, if someone just pretends to give the right answer, but in fact gives you their own address, you may end up at the wrong website, or in the GPS example, at the wrong house. So instead of visiting your actual bank’s website, you’re going to visit someone else’s website, which looks basically the same, except once you log into your bank account the attacker can read that and steal all your money. In the GPS example, you would now be at the slaughterhouse instead of Disneyland. An encrypted DNS just means that you specify exactly whom you will trust, for example google, and that you want your communication with google to be encrypted, so no one can even read which website you want to visit.

          If someone doesn’t understand this, they wouldn’t understand what a VPN is, even broken down to bare concepts. So for those people: It makes you safe just trust me just set this setting, no app, no account, no money required. Because that’s the level a typical VPN company argues on.

          • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            It seems like your whole threat model is avoiding DNS poisoning, which is fine, but I fail to see how you can compare using DoH/DoT to a VPN.

            so no one can even read which website you want to visit.

            Except for the DNS provider (in your example, Google, so… yikes), the operator of the network you’re on (since the destination IP can be rDNS’d or WHOIS’d, or simply grabbed from the Host header if your browser still tries HTTP first). Any traffic that is not encrypted will be snoopable. Traffic volume and connection times to each destination can be analyzed.

            By contrast, a VPN will also use secure (if you trust the provider ofc) DNS servers for your requests, plus making all of the traffic completely opaque except for “going to this server”.

            no app, no account, no money required

            You can also make your own, free VPN service with a little technical knowledge.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            VPNs are 95% about privacy, not security. So all encrypted DNS does is security? What I want from a VPN is fewer companies accurately spying on me.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Encrypted DNS doesn’t solve everything. Handshake for TLS sessions is still in clear, you can usually see the SNI, and since we are talking about Wireless, usually this data is available to anybody who is in the vicinity, not just the network owner. This already means that you can see what sites someone is visiting, more or less. TLS 1.3 can mitigate some of this (for those who implement ESNI, but you don’t know that beforehand). Also TLS works until the user is not accepting invalid certificates prompts (HSTS doesn’t work for everything) and there are still tons of HTTP-based redirect (check mailing newsletters and see how many first send you to an HTTP site, for example) that can be used for MiTM attacks.

        A VPN moves the trust to a single provider that you can choose, which is much better than trusting every single WiFi network you can attach to and the people connected to it, I would say.

        Also if you pay for the VPN (I pay Proton), it’s not true that the company business is based on user data, they are based on subscriptions.

      • Sem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But most spots don’t have the resources or expertise to analyze and sell or otherwise misuse your logs.

        Most spots don’t have also the resources or expertise to secure their own spot. As I remember, cheap routers used in public places may contain a lot of vulnerabilities.

        encrypted DNS

        Will it help me if I’m using LbreTorrent do download piracy content on my phone? Or how it would help me to hide my location from mobile apps that extract location from IP?

        • Lucy :3@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          No. That’s a whole different use case. We’re discussing what most people in a public network should do. Some people, such as whistleblowers, journalists etc. maybe should use a VPN. For you grandparents, it would be pure snake oil. And even as such an endangered person, choosing the wrong, so almost all, VPNs would be even more dangerous.

          For your problems, a VPN could be useful, even though for the former I would use the usenet or soap2day-like sites, which do not have you seed that content. If you still want to share it, then use a VPN. ONLY for the torrent process, not for anything else, as that would still be bad for privacy and security, as the VPN company could, and most WILL, surveil and log you. And for the latter problem, don’t use such apps except in closed environments or without internet access.

          • Sem@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            And for the latter problem, don’t use such apps except in closed environments or without internet access.

            While that is a right answer, I do not want to avoid such apps because I need them. I need my mobile bank app, I need google camera, sometimes I need Google maps, etc. For me using VPN to hide my real IP from greedy apps and to hide DNS requests from the cracked public WiFi is still a good tradeoff between security, privacy and my own user experience.

            • Lucy :3@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If it works for you, and you found a VPN provider you can trust, or at least have the feeling of that, great! That is one of the very rare use cases where VPNs are not only useful, but actually have a purpose.

              On a broader scale, most people won’t find a trustworthy VPN, and would use it for way more than they need to, essentially giving all data to the VPN company now, instead of just to the local Café or google.

              And for the bank app, there is no replacement. Google’s camera can be replaced by OpenCamera, or just disallowed to access the internet, and google maps can almost perfectly be replaced by organic maps

              • Sem@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                I have Pixel with GrapheneOS and I tried most of FOSS camera apps, but all of them are still far behind the GCam. I hope one day there will be a good replacement, but not today.

                I’m using Organic / OsmAnd for most of use cases and daily navigation. But if you need to find a specific office, shop, food or ATM nearby you still need GMap from time to time…

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lmao, we’re not worried about the cafe. We’re worried about the man in the middle. And yeah with enough tech knowledge you can set up an encrypted tunnel home and use your normal connection from there. But most people aren’t that tech savvy

        • Lucy :3@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you’re not relatively tech savy, a typical VPN IS the man in the middle. That’s the problem. A VPN, in itself, is very good. But as you said, non-tech savy users won’t be able to set up a VPN themselves, so they need to trust a company to route all their traffic, be their DNS server, not log anything, not be hacked and not give any data to current or future totalitarian governments. Not even I could recommend any VPN company that fulfills enough points there, especially the security related ones.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            For the average person, data sales aren’t the worry. Heck their phone is already recording everything. The worry is straight up criminal enterprise, like keylogging bank passwords. If the VPN company is doing stuff like that then they’re going to eat a RICO charge. Most people really don’t care that their data gets sold.

            • Lucy :3@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              And then just setting a private DNS and checking “the little lock at your address bar” fully prevents any digital sniffing of your credentials. No VPN needed.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        People can’t learn not to throw trash in the street, climate change that is backed by decades of science is a problem, or hell, they can’t even learn to effectively not click on super suspicious phishing links.

        How on earth are they going to learn about implementing encrypted DNS when most barely know the difference between a browser and a computer.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol look at statistics of smokers. Waaay more than 0.01% of people in any given country and 90% of smokers throw cigarette butts on the ground. That is just that one example.

            If you have ever traveled to the southern US, oof.

      • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve never really understood that argument. Most VPN software I’ve seen forces your DNS through the VPN as well which would bypass a public Wi-Fi’s attempt to DNS poison.

        I use a VPN anytime I’m not on my home network just because it’s a super easy way for me to force my DNS to my own custom DNS with Adblock listing on the machine that’s running the VPN endpoint.

        It’s wireguard, and it connects to a direct IP address. If someone tries to redirect or otherwise man in the middle of the connection wireguard will simply fail to establish a connection. Thanks to the fact that it uses a similar idea to pgp where the client and server already have each other’s public keys and there’s not really an unencrypted initial handshake even the initial talking has a form of encrypted communication thanks to the key pairings.

        So like, my vpn is definitely proving security. Whether or not every random ass VPN you can buy is smart enough to force all DNS over the VPN or anything else I guess I can’t say for sure maybe it’s not common and that’s why but it definitely can be used to help automate some security measures when using a public network

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    When I first saw this I thought it was funny. The fact that so many people are falling for it has only made it even funnier.

    FWIW, Haley Welch might seem dumb as bricks, but she also seems quite sweet - doing charity stuff, keeping her other friend from “that” vid for the ride, etc. As far as people becoming famous for bullshit reasons goes, she seems to be handling it well.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel bad for her, honestly. She was open about her sexuality and she’s conventionally attractive, so now she has all these leering old men on TV slobbering all over her.

      Bill Maher practically tried to talk her into bed on his show with his creepy shit about mentoring her.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oof. What is up with these creepy, sweaty dudes on talkshows? I know they somewhat reflect the general populace, but to pull shit like this on air is just boggling.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          They don’t reflect the “general populace” it’s just that you kinda have to be an asshole to become famous or you become an asshole afterwards.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You know, you’re the first person I’ve seen that’s shared the same view as me (not that I’ve spoken about the topic much! lol)

        Woman admits that she has performed an extremely benign sexual act before - ghasp! A girl has given someone a blowjob before!

        And more than that, she has a “dumb” accent! Let’s make endless memes about her online basically calling her a slutty moron whose only life skill is sucking cock.

        Honestly no wonder women feel pressured to pretend they have no sexual desires

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Honestly, I never understand why people like this get the level of fame that they do, but at least stop creeping on the poor lady.

      • thrawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Okay so I haven’t heard about her before this but, from this thread and a quick google search, I feel like I know enough. Anyway. I’m hopeful then that the fame will pass— lots of internet fad celebrities fade and become more or less normal people again soon— but she pockets enough money to live a good life and keep paying it forward.

    • Faresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I didn’t know who she was, so I just assumed it was true and that she was just another celebrity sponsored by a VPN company.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup, I don’t know who she is, nor do I particularly care. What I do care about is how Proton behaves, and if they’re going to stoop to the levels other VPN providers go to in order to attract customers, it’s not a service I’d like to support.

        I’m currently not a Proton customer, but I’ve been considering it. I’m currently w/ Tuta for email and use a DIY VPN, but I could see switching to Proton as their product line expands.

      • triptrapper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        You think she’s not handling fame well because she’s setting clear boundaries, and reminding fans that she’s not their friend just because she’s famous?

        • NineMileTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, because she has a reaction video to every single negative thing anyone says on TikTok. I’m all for her boundaries.

          • ripcord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            she has a reaction video to every single negative thing anyone says on TikTok

            Ew.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know how effective VPNs are over a public WiFi network, but I do know it stopped Spectrum from sending me “you are downloading copyrighted material, stop it” emails once I started using one. Fuck Spectrum, I don’t have them anymore, but that seems like a good enough reason to keep using one in certain circumstances.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They need to advertise a legitimate use for their service.

      If they don’t have a threat from public wifi or other security concerns to remedy, then the only purpose for their service is to bypass region limits and block infringement notices. They would be considered complicit in such infringement.

      That their service also hinders efforts to stop pirates needs to be an “unintended” and “unavoidable” side effect.

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I use Proton when I’m on my university’s campus because they switched to using EDUroam for the campus wifi. I used to be a Sys Admin at a different university a while back, and from what I know, EDUroam allows the IT department to monitor basically all of the traffic over the network. I don’t know exactly how deep that stuff goes, but if I was doing anything personal or sensitive like banking or whatever, I’d flip on the VPN on my personal computer. I also don’t have any personal accounts logged in on the school issued laptop because they have it loaded with institutional spyware. Once I graduate, I’ll blank the drive and reinstall the OS to have a decent Lenovo laptop on hand as a spare.

        Edit to add: I use Proton because it was the least shady service that I could get for a reasonable price as a student. It is also helpful for finding textbooks. :)

        • exu@feditown.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They can’t decrypt HTTPS unless you installed a certificate controlled by them. The only thing they can know is which domains you visited, but not what you did on it.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are plenty of legitimate uses for their services, they just aren’t things that the vast majority of people actually need. For example:

        • access things in a LAN from a WAN - i.e. access a personal PC when you’re at a friend’s house, and your home LAN is behind CGNAT
        • get around local laws - e.g. my state requires ID checks for porn and social media, so getting a VPN one state over gets around that
        • prevent ISP from seeing the sites you visit - very valid privacy concern, especially since SNI exists to de-mask TLS packets

        There are also some sketchier needs, such as:

        • get different content on your streaming platform
        • hide sharing of illegal content (i.e. piracy)
        • perform illegal transactions (e.g. going on Tor to buy drugs or whatever on the black market)

        I think VPNs are trying to appeal to more than just the above needs, they’re trying to create needs to grow their marketshare. That isn’t something a reputable VPN should do, or at least that’s something that would make me hesitate to use a given VPN.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you want to give an anonymous video to the press or the police. If you don’t hide your ip then it isn’t anonymous and they’ll come question you.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m not defending Proton. I don’t even use them.

        Edit: The region limits thing is nice though. It’s not why I got the VPN, but it’s nice to not have to pay to watch the Olympics and just watch it via the CBC or the BBC.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      On public WiFi I just vpn into my home network. The issue with public WiFi is that it can be sniffed by anyone in range since there is generally no encryption.

      Although pretty much everything we do is over tls these days, and DoH helps protect against even dns sniffing. There’s still at least some risk to working in the clear over a public WiFi network. At least in information gathering, what bank you use, etc.

      But, there’s no real benefit in using a paid vpn over one you own unless you’re downloading illegal content, want to watch another Netflix region, or are in a country with heavy Internet monitoring/filtering.

        • obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          He said “which bank”, which could be determined by the sniffing DNS requests, or seeing which IPs his computer is connecting to.

          Not a breach of his personal information (assuming the bank that he’s using and the client he’s using after putting everything in TLS properly).

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              But you can see the ip address, which will id the bank. They can derive other information by ip addresses or leaked data and there’s still things using unencrypted connections even today. I generally just connect to my home vpn so at least it’s inly my isp spying on me.

                • r00ty@kbin.life
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I think this is one of the things that ech is meant to solve. But ech/esni is still not widespread on smaller sites yet I think.

        • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Possibly the domain is visible with a traffic monitoring tool. Everything else is between you and the bank via HTTPS. Having said that, whatever is not over https is visible to whoever sits on the same network as yourself.

          • blarth@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Importantly, you probably don’t know what all is encrypted in every app you use on your phone, so it’s best practice to encrypt the transport.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      All ISPs are legally obligated to forward that shit to you. The alerts are not from spectrum, they’re just relaying the information.

      Right now, copyright owners do not have legal permission to find out who you are directly without a court order. They would only seek that information if they were planning to file a lawsuit.

      Media companies know, from the Napster incident, that such actions can backfire stupendously. It’s rare that they even bother anymore. I can go into detail on why, but I’ll leave it out for brevity.

      So they send the notice to your ISP, who is legally obligated to match the information on the notice to the subscriber and forward the notice to you.

      For many, this goes to an ISP provided mailbox, which most people ignore the existence of it. Clearly spectrum operates differently.

      The notices are from copyright holders who have no idea who you are, and can’t determine that information unless they intend to sue you. So those can be, for the most part, ignored.

      It’s not your ISPs fault that you got those. They couldn’t give a shit less about what you do on their service, or what you download. They just want you to pay your bill every month and keep the gravy train rolling.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fair enough. I haven’t used spectrum, so I have no opinion. I’m not in the right country to subscribe to their service, so there’s that.

          Have a good day.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Spectrum is a total shit ISP that does shady shit constantly, while being owned by a massive corporation run by a Trump supporter and unfortunately is the only option people have in a lot of places in the U.S.

            Anyway, good talk. You have a good day too!

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Considering how most of the Internet is encrypted with TLS, if you add DNSSEC+DoH/DoT on top, trying to MITM someone on a public WiFi is way harder than it was, unless you’re a state-level adversary and you’re able to craft valid certificate for a domain you don’t control from a globally trusted (root) certificate autority (which will lose its trusted status quite fast once discovered, ex: CNNIC)

    • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not all applications on your computer may be encrypting their packet traffic properly, though. That goes especially for the applications that might be trying to reach out for resources on your local home network (like printers, file shares, and other home servers) as well as DNS requests which are usually still made in the open. I would not recommend eschewing an entire security layer willy-nilly like that. On public Wi-Fi, I would definitely still suggest either a VPN or using your cell phone as a tether or secure hotspot instead if possible.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure, but it’s also like, if you’re stepping away from your laptop for a few minutes should you lock the screen or shut it down completely.

        The most secure option is to shut it down completely, but also it’s fine to just lock your screen.

        If you’ve already got a VPN and it’s as easy as locking your screen to enable, go for it, use it. But if you don’t, you don’t need to go out and get one. You’ll generally be ok without one.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, the days of your local coffee shops Wi-Fi being a problem or mostly gone. Not the VPN doesn’t have a place anymore though. If you’re trying to hide your downloading of ISOs from your ISP it’s still a perfectly reasonable method. Or temporarily relocating yourself to another country to make a purchase or watch some streaming content both perfectly reasonable.

      Of course some of the streaming providers are getting wise to this.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s all fun and games until a Microsoft Purity Enforcement squad is kicking in your door.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nah, it’s all good I subscribe to Linus Torvalds protection services. When the Microsoft vans get within four blocks of my address, They’ll drop ship in dozens of fully-armed penguin paratroopers. After the incursion they even send in a penguin based cleaner team to help get rid of the remains.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          You don’t want their admin to contact you about how you’re a n00b for not using Arch.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because we see which distros you’re using, and we judge you for it.

          Gentoo, in 2024? Really? You should be using Arch if that’s your thing. It’s not the 90s any more.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Arch? I prefer EndeavorOS as it lets me easily install an arch distro using a nice GUi, I really don’t care about the nitty gritty of setting up my own network manually, i am like 99.9% of people in that regard

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, pptp will always have a strong purpose and home. I’m more speaking to the viability of commercial anonymization VPN.

          • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have a feeling you are using pptp as shorthand for Point to Point disregarding protocol and already knows what I’m about to say. To anyone else reading this - PPTP is obsolete and unsafe. Use an alternative such as OpenVPN, WireGuard or SSTP.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Tailscale FTW. I honestly haven’t looked at the underlying protocols in years. Was using ubiquiti’s implementation of openVPN but it seemed to get grumpy when you connect one user multiple times.

              Poking around at available products, I had settled on zero tier and tailscale, I went ahead and tried tail scalefirst because it was basically free for my house. One month in, I had a few decent detectable guys at work join me on a trial there. Full licenses for everybody at work cost less than my Cisco refresh. And makes it so that the office is no longer a critical hosting site.

    • thirteene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hailey “Hawk Tuah” Welch is an influencer that gained a lot of popularity from her nickname (the sound of spitting, with HEAVY implications of performing fellacio). She used her platform to voice a very reasonable and intelligent opinion, which surprised a lot of people because her nickname is essentially blowjob queen.

      One of her opinions is that it’s important to spread cyber security and used her fame to try to educate the public (potentially a fake story from the image? Idk this drama). And some xit-head claiming to be a cyber security expert ate the onion and offered some shitty advice. Proton fact checked them, because there are a ton of fake news stories about her right now.

  • RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand why everyone assumes using a VPN means paying for a third party. I have Wireguard deployed in my NAS and I always have that VPN connection active on my phone to be able to access my LAN deployed services remotely, Jellyfin for example.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most VPNs sell themselves on encrypting your traffic to an endpoint that either is in a different locale to get around region locks or to put it out of the grasp of the RIAA so they can’t send your ISP copyright notices.

      While remote access to a local network is a good use case for a self-hosted VPN it’s totally unrelated to the use case for commercial VPNs

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For the use case of encrypting your traffic while using a public WiFi, both commercial VPNs and self-hosted ones provide the same functionality.

        • OR3X@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think the point they’re getting at Is that you can’t use a self-hosted vpn to hide your piracy activity because the link is registered to yourself.

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, but this thread is about security while using public Wi-Fi, which the original comment was saying doesn’t require commercial VPNs.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              And I highly doubt people are pirating while on public wi-fi, the bandwidth just isn’t good enough, and even if it was, it would be a dick move to other public wi-fi users.

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes that’s true. But also that’s the wink and nudge marketing claim that VPN marketers make while everyone knows the real reason you are using a VPN.

          With HTTPS, DNS-over-HTTPS, and most endpoint firewalls dropping non-gateway traffic, the risk is a lot less than the VPN ad reads want you to believe

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            DNS-over-HTTPS sounds like it’ll be the least used by general public since most people I know are still using default DNS settings which would point towards their ISP’s. I’m not sure how many ISPs have moved towards DNS-over-HTTPS or if they are even activated by default.

            • exu@feditown.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Firefox has DoT enabled by default, maybe Chrome does the same. That would cover the use-case of most people on public wifi.

                • exu@feditown.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Both, the browsers (and any other application) can choose to ignore your DNS settings and use whatever other mechanisms they like.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Since Wireguard uses UDP and peers only reply to a received packet if it’s expected and valid, it won’t show up in port scans and barely increases your attack surface. Tailscale and Zerotier are quite nice, but personally I dislike NAT-punching protocols.

      • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I use tailscale for hosting gameservers for friends and the occasional watch together on jellyfin. Kinda scuffed setup with one burner github account for login. And ~10 devices connected to that network. So I need to authenticate every device myself (at the beginning and sporadically) but I don’t need to pay Tailscale for adding multiple accounts to the network.

        At the beginning I tried to do set up everything with my own wireguard server. I only have a public v6 IP, so some of my friends connected without problems and for some it would not work. After I think 3h helping them in their router settings I just gave up. I looked up if I could rent a service somewhere that gives me a public Ipv4 relay, found Tailscale instead and stopped looking for something else haha. Sometimes it’s not worth the effort.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I am technical, I decided to just not open up any port that’s not needed for Plex and Jellyfin, sometimes it would be nice to access radarr and sonarr remotely, but fuck I just don’t want to deal with the setup

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s also worth mentioning that the VPN in question, Proton, offers one of the best free tiers of any VPN company.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Agreed. I’ve used it, and it’s perfectly fine for normal web browsing. In fact, I added it to my router a while ago to test it out, and I’m considering leaving it on as a “secure” SSID so we can use it for things that my state requires ID for (e.g. porn and social media).

    • s_s@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t understand why everyone assumes using a VPN means paying for a third party.

      It’s because that is what is advertised to them.

    • diffusive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      My setup as well (plus encrypted DNS for good measure)

      I still have to somehow trust my ISP but I go down from having to trust my mobile ISP, my employer WiFi, random shops WiFi to just one ISP (that,fwiw, has shown to be transparent, customers friendly etc)

    • mat@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I tried setting this up, and I can connect to my honeserver, but I’ve no idea how to access its LAN services. How does it work?

      • Zanathos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do you have internal DNS set up? I have my wire guard deployed on both of my pihole servers, which have local DNS entries for my internal services, which point back to my internal Traefik container for NAT translations. I know that sounds a bit complicated, but that’s how it works for my environment.

        • mat@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wow yeah, that’s way more than what I have haha. So I guess I need to look into DNS…

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I do the same, but it’s very clear that when people talk about “a VPN” they’re referring to a commercial cloud hosted product.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yup, I have the same, but not to access services on my devices, but to tunnel services so they can become public services. Basically, Jellyfin is accessible at mydomain.com, which tunnels traffic over WireGuard to my internal Jellyfin instance. I’ll connect to the VPN occasionally if I need to access something else on my network though.

      That said, I’ve considered paying for a VPN service so I can get around my state’s stupid ID laws around porn and social media, which I consider to be a massive privacy violation. But it hasn’t bothered me enough to actually spend the $5/month or whatever.

  • priapus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was nothing more than a poorly executed joke from Proton. Some people are massively overreacting.

  • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    obviously the shitty VPNs like NordSurshark, TorGuard, Tunnelbear, cyberghost and PrivateInternetExpress suck…pretty much every VPN that’s part of some giant conglomerate sucks ass in terms of privacy and security

    But then there’s iVPN, Mullvad and ProtonVPN and even Adguard VPN which do very little to no advertising at all and allow their products to speak for themselves. I mean…Kitboga and RionaPoison are sponsored by Proton, but Proton is a good company that takes their security and the security of their swiss-law-abiding users very seriously.

    Don’t be a scumbag and Proton won’t snitch on you.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The VPNs you characterise as “shitty” aren’t necessarily a bad choice; they’re cheaper than the legitimate privacy VPNs. Mullvad is famously 5€ per month, Proton is 4.49€ per month, but NordVPN is 3.09€, Surfshare is 2.19€, and PIA is 1.79€ per month.

      If you’re really just here to pretend you’re in another country (rather than privatemaxing) or hide your torrenting activity from your ISP, the cheaper options can be a perfectly legitimate choice.

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Mullvad doesn’t try and lock you in with any auto-renewal shenanigans and was the second service that I know of to offer payment via xmr. The first was ivpn but their server speeds were trash.

  • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thank goodness someone explained that to me. I was startong to wonder if she was some sort of technology expert, or something.

  • chagall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was poorly executed. The National Park Service twitter account does jokes well.

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    So I’m confused networking stuff has never been my strong suit, is this saying you can still be fucked on public WiFi even if you connect through a VPN?

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are some attacks you are vulnerable to on public WiFi that a VPN can help with.

      More generally, whoever is transporting your data knows who you are talking to. If you don’t use a VPN, your ISP and whoever owns the router know what websites you are visiting (although they don’t know the specific content). If you use a VPN, your ISP and router know you are using that VPN, but not what websites you are visiting. Now your VPN knows what websites you are visiting, but they still don’t know what the content is.

      I hope that helps.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can substitute “Tor” for “VPN” in the above and be largely correct. Tor acts like a VPN, but every packet goes through multiple hops, so an attacker would need to do quite a bit of work (i.e. compromise multiple nodes) to link traffic to you.

          So:

          • TLS (https) - network owner can’t see specific content, but can determine what sites you visit
          • VPN - network owner can’t tell what sites you visit, but can tell you’re on a VPN; VPN can tell what sites you visit, but not specific content
          • Tor - network owner can’t tell what sites you visit, but can tell you’re using Tor; Tor exit node operators can see what sites people using it visit, but can’t attribute it to an individual user w/o a sophisticated attack

          In most cases, TLS is perfectly fine, provided you make sure to not click through any TLS errors (i.e. certificate can’t be validate => probable middle-man attack), and using a VPN is probably overkill. A VPN protects you from that middle-man attack, but honestly, if you’re savvy enough to use a VPN, you’re probably savvy enough to not get compromised by a middle-man attack. Likewise if you use Tor, you’re probably savvy enough to not get compromised by a middle-man attack.

          That said, I fully support using Tor and VPNs, I just won’t go so far as to say someone is dumb for not using them on public Wi-Fi. Make sure you’re connecting to a real Wi-Fi service and don’t disable TLS protections and you’re probably fine, from a security perspective. If you’re likely to be targeted by a government agency, Tor is the bare minimum of what you should use.

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yup. The way I’ve always described it is this:

            Http means your employer knows you watched porn on the company WiFi, and they also know which specific videos and what your username for the site is. If site security is particularly lax, they may even know your password.

            Https means your employer can see you watched porn on the company WiFi, but they don’t know which video(s) specifically, and they don’t know your login info.

            VPN means your employer only knows you connected to a VPN. They may be able to take educated guesses at what type of content you were viewing (streaming video, for example, has a pretty easily identifiable pattern of data transfer,) but they don’t know what video you were watching, or what site it was coming from. The VPN service knows you watched porn, but the aforementioned rules about http and https still apply; If you’re using https, they don’t know specifics.

            Tor means even the VPN doesn’t know which specific video(s) you’re watching, because they just see a connection to another Tor node, which sees another tor node, which sees another tor node… Etc. In order to know what you’re watching, they would need to own every node in the chain. If they own both the entry and exit node they may be able to match it to you with a timing attack, (they see packets going into the Tor network at the same time they see packets coming out towards you). Again, they can make educated guesses based on pattern recognition, but they won’t have a clear picture without owning both your entry and exit nodes and performing a timing attack.

            Now you can substitute “your employer” for anyone who is trying to get your info. Public WiFi spoofer, your ISP, etc…

      • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        What about DoH/DoT which comes enabled by default in some browsers I believe? This should “hide” your activity from isp/router as well, shouldn’t it?

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          The ISP will always know the IP you’re connecting to. Encrypted DNS might get you slightly more privacy for sites using shared IPs like with Cloudflare. But in a lot of cases, there’s only 1 website per IP, so the ISP still knows where you’re browsing. A VPN solves this by routing all traffic through the VPNs IP first. But you can still be tracked just the same by the VPN and to an extent, the VPNs ISP.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes and no.

          Modern HTTPS connections send the URL you are connecting to in the initial hello, so the remote webserver knows what security certificate to use when you connect. A lot of web servers host multiple sites, especially for smaller webpages, and so it doesn’t assume that since you connected to that specific webserver, that you’re connecting to the site that the webserver is hosting, even if it’s only hosting a single site.

          This can leak the data to anyone sniffing the traffic.

          You can also determine some traffic by IP address, this is for larger web services like Facebook, youtube and other sites of similar size. They load balance groups of IPs for their traffic, all are serving the same data. So if you connect to an IP that’s owned by Facebook, for example, then your actions can be easily derived.

          Since the connection is still secured by TLS, the content can’t be deciphered, but the location you are going to absolutely can.

          It really depends on a lot of factors.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Networking stuff IS my strong suit, and I’m confused about what points most people here, including OP, are trying to make here. Maybe I’m just not awake enough yet.

      Wtf proton what? What do people think Proton is saying and what’s the WTF part…?

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think the confusion has anything to do with networking. I’ve been puzzling over this post for a few minutes now… To be honest, I think I’m just more confused.

        Maybe this is some sort of AI battle of the wits or contagious stroke or something.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Look at the link in the description.

        Basically, someone went on a rant saying using public wi-fi w/o a VPN is extremely risky, and Proton is basically boosting it, implying a relationship w/ the OP. Proton argues that this is satire and part of a viral trend of misattributing quotes and topics, and the poster here is calling Proton out on it, likening them to the scammy VPN companies that sponsor YouTube videos and other SM content that oversell their claims.

        So basically Proton claims they’re being satirical, and the poster is saying they’re just as bad as other VPN companies.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, the context is that for many years, shady commercial VPNs would sponsor YouTubers and the scripts they were given were full of lies and half truths about the dangers of public WiFi, with the implication being that if you purchase their VPN service they will “protect you”. But the problems these VPN companies were claiming to solve have already been solved by HTTPS and it’s perfectly fine to use public WiFi without a VPN. They are using scare tactics to sell you a product.

      What this poster is saying is that they’re disappointed to see this same fear mongering misinformation from Proton, who have an otherwise good reputation for being consumer friendly.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. Using a VPN can improve your anonymity, provided you trust your VPN operator more than the infrastructure you’re using. But many VPN vendors claim a VPN is essential to provide security, which isn’t true in the slightest, and Proton shouldn’t be stooping to that level. There are plenty of good reasons to use a VPN that don’t involve illegal activities, but it’s hardly essential for the average person.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      is this saying you can still be fucked on public WiFi even if you connect through a VPN?

      The quick and dirty answer is no, unless an attacker can figure out a way to get your VPN to strip it’s encryption (doubt you’ll ever see this outside something like defcon but you never know lol).

      The long answer is that not all VPNs are equal depending on what you are trying to accomplish.

      A VPN will simply tunnel your internet traffic over an encrypted channel to a server anywhere in the world.

      On a technical level, this means that it will guarantee your internet traffic is unreadable until it hits the destination, which does mean it can make it more secure to use a public wifi/hotspot.

      Of course privacy is actually a massive security iceberg, so some caveats in no particular order are:

      spoiler
      • Modern protocols like HTTPS are already encrypted, although someone can still mess with stripping and poisoning techniques, so having a VPN running would be peace of mind.

      • Your privacy from companies like Google, Facebook, etc won’t be enforced by a VPN if you don’t also use a new browser session (incognito) because they can easily track your identity via cookies and accounts.

      • Even if you use a fresh session and dedicated VPN accounts, aforementioned tech companies can still identify you via statistical modeling based on your activity. They don’t really care what your IP is unless they need to pay tax for a country or follow some random media block law.

      • Your privacy from the government is nonexistent because most VPN companies will share your info if the government requests it.

      • Lots of VPNs choose to block torrenting so they don’t have to deal with protecting their customers (although lots also don’t).

      • Even if you setup your own VPN via a VPS in anonymous way, the government can still watch your exit traffic and link the origin back to you by inspecting the VPN packets (which is why Tor exists, a much different solution to the privacy problem).

      You should use a VPN if:

      • You want to torrent copyrighted material (yar har piracy)
      • You want to spoof your location to get access to geolocked content
      • You want to negate an attackers ability to mess with your connections on public WiFi
      • You want a secure channel between two of your own locations (make two separate networks accessible to eachother, or VPN to home/work to access resources on that network).
      • ^ same thing but remote access etc.

      You should not use a VPN if:

      • You need to hide what you do on the internet from the government (See Tor, journalists stuck in shithole regimes).
      • You want privacy from internet megacorps (you’d have to keep fresh sessions or use them sparingly which you can 90% do without a VPN anyway)
      • You want to hide anything after it reaches the VPN server (public VPN services, doesn’t apply if you VPN to something you physically own and access only its local resources).

      After all that, the use case basically becomes:

      • VPN to within your own country to secure your connection on public WiFi
      • VPN to home or work to access network
      • VPN with a good public service to other countries to watch or torrent media
    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, to a degree. A VPN protects you from an attacker on the same WiFi network as you and that’s about it.

      Most assaults on your privacy don’t happen like that, and for the most part the attacks that do happen like that are stopped by the website using https and proper modern security.
      The benefit of the VPN is that it puts some of that protection under your control, but only as far as your VPN provider.

      A VPN is about as much protection from most cyber attacks as a gun is.

      They’re not a security tool, they’re a networking tool. They let you do some network stuff securely, and done correctly they can protect from some things, but the point of them is “this looks like a small, simple LAN, but it’s not”.

      It’s much easier to package and sell network tools than security tools, and they’re much more accepted by users, since security tools have a tendency to say “no” a lot, particularly when you might be doing something dumb,and users hate being told no, particularly when they’re doing something dumb.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. VPN companies vastly oversell what their services offer.

        That said, I set up my own VPN, we use one at work, and I’m considering paying for a commercial VPN service. My personal VPN gets around my ISP’s CGNAT so I can host public services within my LAN, my work VPN gives us remote access to protected services, and the commercial VPN I’m considering paying for is to get around my state’s laws (they are requiring ID for porn and social media, and I think that’s a privacy overreach).

        VPNs have their place, but they’re hardly “essential” for most people, especially if your concern is security.

  • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    "It’s a prank bro"😅 but seriously as an IT guy I’m tired of pushing VPNs down our (collective) throats, not saying the threat isn’t real but it’s really overblown by the ads

      • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Better to have ads pushed down our collective throats than let collectivists have us by the throat. An ‘unregulated’ market lets us choose whether or not to use them, instead of justifying their necessity to avoid censorship.